Page tree
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

Read in Recommended support checks about hopefully helpful practises used at ECMWF which can be shared. Some examples and source codes are also available there.

Support checks (on provider's end)

Organization

Data acquisition method

Data transfer checkData delay checkData completeness checkData quality check

BoM (ammc)

ftp



CMA (babj)

ftp



CNR-ISAC (isac)http



CNRM (lfpw)

ecpds (push)



ECCC (cwao)

sftp



ECMWF (ecmf)

MARS retrievalN/AYESYESYES

HMCR (rums)

ftpNOYESYESNO
JMA (rjtd)ftp



KMA (rksl)

ecpds (push, dedicated line)



NCEP (kwbc)ftpYESYESYESNO
UKMO (egrr)ecpds (push, dedicated line)YESYESNONO
  • Data acquisition  method: Acquisition method is pull from the provider's location to ECMWF's premises if not specified
  • Data transfer check: Is the data transfer checked to avoid any technical issues on the way from provider's location to ECMWF's premises? Was the data delivered bit identical?
  • Data delay check: Is the potential delay of  data availability checked on the provider's side?
  • Data completeness check: Is the data content (number of expected fields; reference field list etc) checked on the provider's side?
  • Data quality check: Is there any data quality control to avoid e.g. unrealistic parameter values due to interpolation or any other kind of error either scientific or technical?

Support incidents

Number of operational incidents since August 2018

Year

2018

2019

QuarterQ3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4

created

101112


updated101421


closed5721


  • Number of updated incidents includes the newly created or closed ones
  • Updated or closed incidents may refer to those from previous quarters





  • No labels