...
Info | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
|
History of modifications
Expand | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||
|
List of datasets covered by this document
Expand | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Related documents
Anchor | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Expand | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||
|
Acronyms
Expand | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
General definitions
Active (soil moisture) retrieval: the process of modelling soil moisture from radar (scatterometer and synthetic aperture radar) measurements. The measurand of active microwave remote sensing systems is called “backscatter”.
...
Uncertainty: “Satellite soil moisture retrievals […] usually contain considerable systematic errors which, especially for model calibration and refinement, provide better insight when estimated separate from random errors. Therefore, we use the term bias to refer to systematic errors only and the term uncertainty to refer to random errors only, specifically to their standard deviation (or variance)” (Gruber et al., 2020)
Scope of the document
The Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document (ATBD) provides a detailed description of the algorithms that are used within the C3S Soil Moisture (SM) production system to produce the soil moisture Climate Data Record (CDR) and Interim Climate Data Records (ICDR). This document relates to C3S SM product versions v202312 for CDR and ICDR products.
Executive summary
The C3S SM production system is based on the algorithms initially developed within European Space Agency’s (ESA) Climate Change Initiative (CCI) Soil Moisture Project [D1] and has been updated and re-engineered to enable the provision of soil moisture retrievals on a near-real-time basis. In this context “near real time” refers to the provision of soil moisture information with a minimum delay of 10 days and a maximum of 23 days after sensing. This ATBD consists of a description of the input and auxiliary data used in the soil moisture retrievals, a description of the algorithms behind the soil moisture retrievals for both active and passive microwave observations, a description of the merging process and finally an overview of the output data.
...
Chapter 3 gives an in-depth description of the algorithm used to retrieve soil moisture from passive microwave observations and points to relevant resources regarding active microwave retrievals from external operational sources. It contains a description of the main principles and methodologies in the LPRM, information on the parametrization for the most common frequency bands and the retrieval of soil moisture from daytime observations. An overview over currently known limitations of the model under certain conditions is given. The chapter also described the merging strategy applied in C3S soil moisture, i.e. how the retrievals from different satellite sensors are combined into a consistent merged soil moisture database, and how new data is repeatedly appended to this record. Chapter 4 briefly describes the output fields of the final soil moisture product.
Product Change Log
Table 1 provides an overview of the differences between different versions of the product up-to, and including, the current version v202312 (CDR v5.0). For a full list of all records provided in this version, see Table "List of datasets covered by this document".
...
Version | Product Changes |
---|---|
v202312 | Artificial breaks in the COMBINED product are now removed using the Quantile Category Matching method described in Preimesberger et al. (2021). |
v202212 | The PASSIVE and COMBINED product now include SM data from FengYun 3B/C/D and GPM, which are derived using v7 of the Land Parameter Retrieval Model (LPRM). TMI is extended to 2015, and scatterometer derived SM from ASCAT-C using the Water Retrieval Package (WARP) is included for the first time. This version also includes day-time observations for all passive data, a new approach to estimate intra-annual changes in error estimates for single sensors, updated flagging of frozen soils in active and passive data, cross flagging of frozen soils between active and passive data, and the first optional flag (i.e. soil moisture values are provided when this flag is active; users can decide whether to use them or not) in the product: for grid cells dynamically classified as "bare ground". |
v202012 | The PASSIVE and COMBINED product now include SM data from SMAP brightness temperature measurements derived through the LPRM v6 retrieval model. Intercalibration of AMSRE and AMSR2 observations, that lead to a negative break in PASSIVE SM in the past has been corrected. The CDF matching method has been updated. LPRM v6 is now used to derive SM for all decommissioned passive sensor products. |
v201912 | Product algorithm same as v201812. Product extended to 2019-12-31. |
v201812 | Product algorithm updated and now based on ESA CCI SM v4.4 rather than v4.3 applied to version v201806. Product extended to 2018-12-31. |
v201806 | The combined product is now generated by merging all active and passive L2 products directly, rather than merging the generated active and passive products. Spatial gaps in TC-based SNR estimates now filled using a polynomial SNR_VOD regression. sm_uncertainties now available globally for all sensors except SMMR. A p-value based mask used to exclude unreliable input data sets in the combined product has been modified and it is also applied to the passive product. Masking of unreliable retrievals is undertaken prior to merging. |
v201801 | Updated CDR includes SMOS data from the end of 2016 onwards. SMOS is also included in the ICDRs produced from January 2018 onwards. CDR produced until 2017-12-31; ICDR produced from 2018-01-01. |
v201706 | First release of the dataset. CDR produced until 2017-06-30; ICDR produced from 2017-07-01. |
Instruments
The CDR/ICDR each comprise of three products, being termed "active", "passive" and "combined", with each product being provided at three different temporal resolutions (daily, dekadal and monthly). A suite of data from various sensors are used in generating each product depending upon the temporal period and latitude of the retrieval. A schematic overview of the instruments used in the generation of the CDR/ICDR is provided in Figure 1, with information about the sensor characteristics being provided in Sections 1.1 and 1.2.
Anchor | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Figure 1: Temporal coverage of input products used to construct the CDR/ICDR: ACTIVE (blue), PASSIVE (red), COMBINED (red and blue) products.
Passive Microwave Systems
Satellite missions from different space agency during the last 40+ years were equipped with microwave radiometers to measure electromagnetic radiation emitted by Earth at different frequencies in the microwave domain. A selection of frequency bands (L-, C-, X-, and Ku-band) allows the retrieval of soil moisture information from these measurements using the Land Parameter Retrieval Model (LPRM; described in more detail in Chapter 3.1). The model is applied to all hereafter listed passive sensors as part of the production of C3S SM. An overview over the data providers, data properties, used sensors and their main characteristics are given in the following chapters.
Nimbus-7 SMMR (NASA)
Originating System | Scanning Multichannel Microwave Radiometer on board Nimbus 7 |
---|---|
Data class | Earth observation |
Sensor Type and key technical characteristics |
|
Data Availability and Coverage | October 1978 – August 1987, 180°W 90°S – 180°E 90°N
|
Source Data Name and Product Technical Specifications | SMMR Level 1b
|
Data Quantity | Total volume is 70 GB (compressed) |
Data Quality and Reliability | Instrument specification:
Validation reports
|
Ordering and delivery mechanism | Ordering via NSIDC Data Centre
|
Access conditions and pricing | Freely accessible |
Issues | In 1986 there is a high frequency of bad antenna counts, especially during and for some time after the Special Operations Period (April – October 1986). Interpolating radiometric samples within scans and between adjacent scans tends to smear the effect of these "bad" antenna counts, which are most noticeable in browse image maps of 6.6 GHz horizontal polarization data. |
DMSP-SSM/I (NESDIS NOAA)
Originating System | the Special Sensor Microwave Imager (SSM/I) of the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) |
---|---|
Data class | Earth observation |
Sensor Type and key technical characteristics |
|
Data Availability and Coverage | F08 (Jun 87 – Aug 1991), F10 (Dec 1990 – Nov 1997), F11 (Nov 1991 – Dec 2000), F13 (Mar 1995 – Now), F14 (May 1997 – Aug 2008), F15 (Dec 1999, Now), 180°W 90°S – 180°E 90°N
|
Source Data Name and Product Technical Specifications | Version 6 20+ years SSMI brightness temperatures
|
Data Quantity | 100 GB/year |
Data Quality and Reliability | Instrument specification:
Validation reports
|
Ordering and delivery mechanism | Ordering via SSMI Data Centre [No longer available online] Delivery is possible via
|
Access conditions and pricing | Freely accessible |
Issues | The data used here is based on a series of different satellites. |
TRMM-TMI (NASA/JAXA)
Originating System | Tropical Rainfall Measurement Mission Microwave Imager (TRMM-TMI) |
---|---|
Data class | Earth observation |
Sensor Type and key technical characteristics |
|
Data Availability and Coverage | November 1997 – April 2015, 180°W 38°S – 180°E 38°N |
Source Data Name and Product Technical Specifications | Level 1 b calibrated brightness temperatures TRMM TMI |
Data Quantity | 10 GB per year |
Data Quality and Reliability | Instrument specification:
Validation reports
|
Ordering and delivery mechanism | Ordering via NASA GES DISC Data Centre |
Access conditions and pricing | Freely accessible |
Issues | The satellite observations slightly changed after a boost in August 2001 and there is a pre-boost dataset (before 7-8-2001) and a post boost dataset (after 24-8-2001). TRMM satellite orbit declining March/April 2015. |
AQUA-AMSR-E
Originating System | The Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer onboard the AQUA satellite |
---|---|
Data class | Earth observation |
Sensor Type and key technical characteristics |
|
Data Availability and Coverage | June 2002 – October 2011, 180°W 89.24°S – 180°E 89.24°N
|
Source Data Name and Product Technical Specifications | AMSR-E/Aqua L2A Global Swath Spatially-Resampled Brightness Temperatures
|
Data Quantity | 1 TB per year |
Data Quality and Reliability | Instrument specification:
Validation reports
|
Ordering and delivery mechanism | Ordering via NASA GES DISC or NSIDC data center: |
Access conditions and pricing | Freely accessible |
Issues | Versions older than V07 had significant geolocation problems (a few km off). |
Coriolis WindSat (Naval Research Laboratory)
Originating System | WindSat Radiometer onboard the Coriolis satellite |
---|---|
Data class | Earth observation |
Sensor Type and key technical characteristics |
|
Data Availability and Coverage | January 2003 – present, 180°W 90°S – 180°E 90°N
|
Source Data Name and Product Technical Specifications | WindSat Brightness Temperatures
|
Data Quantity | ~1 TB per year |
Data Quality and Reliability | Instrument specification:
|
Ordering and delivery mechanism | Ordering via Naval Research laboratory |
Access conditions and pricing | Access to brightness temperature data is restricted by data provider and only possible upon request. |
Issues | Access to data from February 2003 to July 2012 was given but is not public. |
GCOM-W1 AMSR-2 (JAXA)
Originating System | The second Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer onboard the GCOM-W1 satellite |
---|---|
Data class | Earth observation |
Sensor Type and key technical characteristics |
|
Data Availability and Coverage | Launch 2012, 180°W 89.24°S – 180°E 89.24°N |
Source Data Name and Product Technical Specifications | LPRM/AMSR2/GCOM-W1 L2 Surface Soil Moisture, Ancillary Params, and QC |
Data Quantity | ~42 GB per year |
Data Quality and Reliability | Instrument specification:
|
Ordering and delivery mechanism | Please see |
Access conditions and pricing | Freely accessible |
Issues | N/A |
SMOS (ESA)
Originating System | Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity Mission |
---|---|
Data class | Earth observation |
Sensor Type and key technical characteristics |
|
Data Availability and Coverage | November 2009 – Now, 180°W 90°S – 180°E 90°N |
Source Data Name and Product Technical Specifications | SMOS Level 3 brightness temperatures (MIR_CDF3TA & MIR_CDF3TD datasets for ascending and descending overpass)
|
Data Quantity | ~5 Tb per year |
Data Quality and Reliability | Instrument specification:
|
Ordering and delivery mechanism | Ordering via ESA at https://earth.esa.int/eogateway/missions/smos/data
|
Access conditions and pricing | Freely accessible |
Issues | Data is continuously reprocessed |
SMAP (NASA)
Originating System | Soil Moisture Active Passive Mission |
---|---|
Data class | Earth observation |
Sensor Type and key technical characteristics |
|
Data Availability and Coverage | March 2015 – cont., N: 85.044, S: -85.044, E: 180, W: -180 |
Source Data Name and Product Technical Specifications | SMAP L3 Radiometer Global Daily 36 km EASE-Grid Soil Moisture (SPL3SMP, ascending and descending overpass) (O'Neill et al. (2020a))
|
Data Quantity | 10GB/year (Level 3, daily data) |
Data Quality and Reliability | Calibration and Validation for the L2/3_SM_P Version 7 and L2/3_SM_P_E Version 4 Data Products (O'Neill et al. (2020c)) |
Ordering and delivery mechanism | Download via NSIDC at https://nsidc.org/data/SPL3SMP |
Access conditions and pricing | Freely accessible |
Issues | Data is continuously reprocessed |
FengYun 3B/C/D (CMA/NSMC)
Originating System | FengYun 3 Series |
---|---|
Data class | Earth observation |
Sensor Type and key technical characteristics | MWRI Micro-Wave Radiation Imager
Sun-synchronous orbit, Altitude: 836 km Design life 3 years with a goal of 4 years |
Data Availability and Coverage | FY3B: ECT 14:45 asc; available 2011-2021 (decommissioned) |
Source Data Name and Product Technical Specifications | FengYun-3 swath based brightness temperature data from Ka- and X-band |
Data Quantity | ~3 GB per year (Level 3 LPRM derived soil moisture, asc. & des. orbit data, raw sensor / orbit data is multiple GB per day) |
Data Quality and Reliability | The FengYun-3 Microwave Radiation Imager On-Orbit Verification (Yang et al., 2011) |
Ordering and delivery mechanism | Ordering through data portal (limited to 100 GB per day) |
Access conditions and pricing | Access is via registration and made available for use within the projects via the dragon 5 cooperation https://dragon5.esa.int/ |
Issues | Documentation is largely missing / not publicly accessible, no programmatic Near real time (NRT) data access possible at the moment, hence no inclusion in C3S SM ICDRs. |
GPM (NASA, JAXA)
Originating System | GPM Microwave Imager (GMI) onboard the GPM core observatory. Satellite Evolution of TMI on TRMM |
---|---|
Data class | Earth observation |
Sensor Type and key technical characteristics | GPM Microwave Imager, Multi-purpose imager, with emphasis on precipitation
|
Data Availability and Coverage | GPM Core Observatory launched on February 27th, 2014, data is available from 2014-03-04 to presentNear-global coverage in 2 days; high latitudes (> 70°) not covered. |
Source Data Name and Product Technical Specifications | Raw data: GPM GMI XCAL Common Calibrated Brightness Temperatures L1BASE 1.5 hours 13 km V07 (GPM_BASEGPMGMI_XCAL)
|
Data Quantity | 165.0 MB per file (Brightness Temperature level)~2.5 GB / year (L3 LPRM derived soil moisture data) |
Data Quality and Reliability |
|
Ordering and delivery mechanism | Access through GES DISC portal (HTTP) at https://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov/ |
Access conditions and pricing | Freely accessible |
Issues | Data is continuously reprocessed |
Active Microwave Systems
Soil moisture retrieval from radar scatterometers was first done for ESA's ERS satellites (Wagner 1998; Wagner et al., 1999b). Since then, the Water Retrieval Package (WARP) was developed based on the TU-Wien method to derive soil moisture from backscatter measurements of Eumetsat's MetOp ASCAT sensors (H SAF, 2018), which is now distributed by H SAF as an operational product in near-real-time and used in the generation of C3S soil moisture. Soil moisture products from synthetic aperture radar measurements (such as Sentinel-1) are gaining popularity due to their higher spatial resolution and therefore potential new applications. They are, however, not yet part of the C3S records.
ERS AMI (ESA)
Originating System | Active Microwave Instrument (AMI) Wind Scatterometer (WS) on-board ERS-1 and ERS-2 |
---|---|
Data class | Earth Observation data |
Sensor Type and key technical characteristics |
|
Data Availability and Coverage | IFREMER |
Source Data Name and Product Technical Specifications | IFREMER
ESA Rolling Archive ERS.WSC.UWI (fast delivery product BUFR Format)
|
Data Quantity | ~32 GB |
Data Quality and Reliability | Instrument specification
|
Ordering and delivery mechanism | IFREMER
|
Access conditions and pricing | Freely accessible |
Issues | Due to the loss of gyroscopes onboard of ERS-2 in January 2001, data from 2001/01/17 to 2003/08/13 was initially lost but partly restored later on. |
ASCAT Metop-A (EUMETSAT)
Originating System | Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) onboard Metop-A |
---|---|
Data class | Earth observation |
Sensor Type and key technical characteristics |
|
Data Availability and Coverage | 2007/01/01 – 2021/11/15., 180°W 90°S – 180°E 90°N
|
Source Data Name and Product Technical Specifications | ASCAT Soil Moisture at 12.5 km Swath Grid (EUMETSAT)H101 SSM ASCAT-A NRT O12.5 (H SAF)
|
Data Quantity | ~100 GB/year for L2 soil moisture 25 km resolution |
Data Quality and Reliability | Instrument specification
|
Ordering and delivery mechanism | Ordering via EUMETSAT Data Centre
|
Access conditions and pricing | EUMETSAT data policy |
Issues | ASCAT-A was decommissioned as of 15 November 2021 |
ASCAT Metop-B (EUMETSAT)
Originating System | Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) onboard Metop-B |
---|---|
Data class | Earth observation |
Sensor Type and key technical characteristics |
|
Data Availability and Coverage | 2012/11/06 – cont., 180°W 90°S – 180°E 90°N |
Source Data Name and Product Technical Specifications | ASCAT Soil Moisture at 12.5 km Swath Grid (EUMETSAT)SSM ASCAT-B NRT O12.5 H16 (H SAF)
|
Data Quantity | ~100 GB/year for L2 soil moisture 25 km resolution |
Data Quality and Reliability | Instrument specification
Validation reports
|
Ordering and delivery mechanism | Ordering via EUMETSAT Data Centre
|
Access conditions and pricing | EUMETSAT data policy |
Issues | Intercalibration between MetOp-B and MetOp-A NRT data is only available after June 2015 because of which MetOp-B can only be used after this date in C3S SM. A backward processing of MetOp-B may be performed once intercalibrated data become available from H-SAF/EUMETSAT. |
ASCAT Metop-C (EUMETSAT)
Originating System | Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) onboard Metop-C |
---|---|
Data class | Earth Observations |
Sensor Type and key technical characteristics |
|
Data Availability and Coverage | 2018/11 – cont., 180°W 90°S – 180°E 90°N (global) |
Source Data Name and Product Technical Specifications | ASCAT Soil Moisture at 12.5 km Swath Grid (EUMETSAT)SSM ASCAT-C-NRT O12.5 (H104) (H SAF)
|
Data Quantity | ~100 GB/year for L2 soil moisture 25 km resolution |
Data Quality and Reliability | Accuracy: threshold S/N 3 dB, target S/N 3 dB, optimal S/N 6 dB |
Ordering and delivery mechanism | Dissemination: FTP, EUMETCast (type NRT) |
Access conditions and pricing | EUMETSAT data policy |
Issues | N/A |
Input and auxiliary data
In the following an overview of the input and auxiliary data is provided. A division is made between data which is used as input for data production (Sections 2.1 and 2.2) and for validation activities (Section 2.3).
Advisory flags
The following section describes datasets that are used to generate the advisory flags provided as additional information to the soil moisture products. The advisory flags are not provided as part of the soil moisture datasets but only as datasets to support interpretation and analysis of the soil moisture products.
SSM/I-SSMIS EASE-Grid Daily Global Ice Concentration and Snow Extent
Originating System | Special Sensor Microwave Imager (SSM/I) and Special Sensor Microwave Imager/Sounder (SSMIS) |
---|---|
Data class | Earth observation |
Sensor Type and key technical characteristics | The SSM/I is a seven-channel, four-frequency, orthogonally polarized, passive microwave radiometric system that measures atmospheric, ocean and terrain microwave brightness temperatures at 19.35, 22.2, 37.0, and 85.5 GHz. |
Data Availability and Coverage | 1995/05/04 – cont., 180°W 90°S – 180°E 90°N |
Source Data Name and Product Technical Specifications | SSM/I-SSMIS EASE-Grid Daily Global Ice Concentration and Snow Extent |
Data Quantity | ~800 MB/year |
Data Quality and Reliability | |
Ordering and delivery mechanism | Data are available via FTP over Internet |
Access conditions and pricing | Freely accessible |
Issues | N/A |
ERA-40
Originating System | ERA-40 is a re-analysis of meteorological observations produced by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) in collaboration with many institutions. The observations used in ERA-40 were accumulated from many sources. |
---|---|
Data class | Gridded analyses, modelled data |
Sensor Type and key technical characteristics | Spatial resolution: 0.5°/2.5° |
Data Availability and Coverage | SEP 1957 – AUG 2002, 180°W 90°S – 180°E 90°N |
Source Data Name and Product Technical Specifications | ERA-40 Project Report Series |
Data Quantity | ~800 MB/year |
Data Quality and Reliability | ERA 40 Performance |
Ordering and delivery mechanism | Detailed information of how to order data can be obtained from the ECMWF Data Services. |
Access conditions and pricing | Freely available after registration |
Issues | N/A |
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
1 The ECMWF Public Datasets service is being decommissioned and access to most datasets closed on June 1st, 2023. In a final step later this year, access to the remaining multi-model datasets S2S and TIGGE will be migrated to a different system. For more information and alternative access, please visit our dedicated page on the Decommissioning of ECMWF Public Datasets service: Decommissioning of ECMWF Public Datasets Service (URL resource validated 18th December 2023) |
Global Lakes and Wetlands Database (GLWD)
Originating System | See Table 1 in Lehner and Döll (2004) |
---|---|
Data class | GIS database |
Sensor Type and key technical characteristics | Organisation in three levels: |
Data Availability and Coverage | Global (except Antarctica) |
Source Data Name and Product Technical Specifications | |
Data Quantity | ~50 MB |
Data Quality and Reliability | More information is provided in Lehner, B. & Döll, P., 2004. |
Ordering and delivery mechanism | Download from FTP |
Access conditions and pricing | GLWD is available for non-commercial scientific, conservation, and educational purposes. |
Issues | N/A |
GTOPO30
Originating System | GTOPO30 is based on data derived from 8 sources of elevation information, including vector and raster data sets |
---|---|
Data class | GIS database |
Sensor Type and key technical characteristics | Digital Terrain Elevation Data (DTED) is a raster topographic data base with a horizontal grid spacing of 3-arc seconds (approximately 90 meters) produced by the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) (formerly the Defense Mapping Agency). |
Data Availability and Coverage | Global |
Source Data Name and Product Technical Specifications | |
Data Quantity | ~3 GB |
Data Quality and Reliability | ±650 m (Vertical) |
Ordering and delivery mechanism | USGS Earth Explorer (https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/) |
Access conditions and pricing | Free |
Issues | N/A |
Merging Framework
The following data sets are used for merging L3 satellite soil moisture products into the harmonised C3S SM records.
Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) V2.0
GLDAS Noah is used in the Triple Collocation Analysis (TCA) step to estimate random uncertainties of the satellite products before merging. GLDAS Noah also acts as the scaling reference for the COMBINED product and is used there to harmonize all sensor time series via Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) matching.
Originating System | The forcing data set combines multiple data sets for the period of January 1, 1979 to present |
---|---|
Data class | Water and energy budget components, forcing data |
Sensor Type and key technical characteristics | Spatial resolution: 0.25° and 1.0° |
Data Availability and Coverage | 1948 – 2010 for 1°x1° |
Source Data Name and Product Technical Specifications | Global Land Data Assimilation System: |
Data Quantity | 3-hourly data |
Data Quality and Reliability | Please see Rodell et al. (2004); "The Global Land Data Assimilation System". |
Ordering and delivery mechanism | Data are available via https://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov/datasets?keywords=GLDAS |
Access conditions and pricing | Freely accessible |
Issues | N/A |
Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) V2.1
GLDAS Noah is used in the TCA step to estimate random uncertainties of the satellite products before merging. GLDAS Noah also acts as the scaling reference for the COMBINED product and is used there to harmonize all sensor time series via CDF matching.
Originating System | The forcing data set combines multiple data sets for the period of January 1, 2000 to present. (see Rodell et al. (2004)), Beaudoing and Rodell (2016) and https://ldas.gsfc.nasa.gov/gldas/ for details) |
---|---|
Data class | Water and energy budget components, forcing data |
Sensor Type and key technical characteristics | Spatial resolution: 0.25° |
Data Availability and Coverage | 2000 – present for 0.25°x0.25° |
Source Data Name and Product Technical Specifications | Global Land Data Assimilation System: |
Data Quantity | 3-hourly data |
Data Quality and Reliability | Rodell et al. (2004). The Global Land Data Assimilation System. |
Ordering and delivery mechanism | Data are available via https://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov/datasets?keywords=GLDAS |
Access conditions and pricing | Freely available |
Issues | None identified |
ERA 5 / ERA5-Land
ECMWF ReAnalysis 5 (ERA5) and ERA5-Land variables are used as part of the soil moisture retrieval process (surface temperature) and act as the reference for break correction (surface soil moisture) in the production of the COMBINED product.
Originating System | ERA5 is the fifth generation ECMWF reanalysis for the global climate and weather for the past 8 decades. Data is available from 1940 onwards. ERA5 replaces the ERA-Interim reanalysis. |
---|---|
Data class | Gridded analyses, modelled data |
Sensor Type and key technical characteristics | 1-hourly surface parameters, describing weather as well as ocean-wave and land-surface conditions, upper-air parameters covering the troposphere and stratosphere, as well as vertical integrals of atmospheric fluxes, monthly averages for many of the parameters, and other derived fields. ERA5-Land has been produced by replaying the land component of the ECMWF ERA5 climate reanalysis. |
Data Availability and Coverage | 1950 – present., 180°W 90°S – 180°E 90°N |
Product Technical Specifications | ERA5: https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47 |
Data Quantity | Depends upon number of variables that are required from the dataset |
Data Quality and Reliability | See Hersbach et al. (2020) and Muñoz-Sabater et al. (2021) |
Ordering and delivery mechanism | ERA5 and ERA5-Land data can be downloaded from the Copernicus Climate Data Store (CDS). Available at https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu |
Access conditions and pricing | Free for research users. See CDS for Terms and conditions: |
Issues | N/A |
Validation data
In situ data from the International Soil Moisture Network (ISMN)
ISMN in situ observations are the primary reference to assess the quality of the satellite based C3S soil moisture products.
Originating System | In situ soil moisture measurements provided mainly from universities and regional and national organizations. Depending on the sites, there are different original data sets generated in 1952 (oldest) or to present. |
---|---|
Data class | Ground-based in-situ measurements data |
Sensor Type | The sensor types most commonly used has changed over the time period of the ISMN:
|
Data Availability and Coverage | Some of the networks began their measurements in 1952, and nowadays there are around 20 networks proving data, five of which are now providing data in near real time. See Dorigo et al. (2011) |
Source Data Name and Product Technical Specifications | The source is open due to the networks data sets are provided from different countries worldwide operated by different universities and national and regional organizations. |
Data Quantity | The temporal resolution of the data sets is very diverse depending on the site: 20 min, 30 min, hourly, 6-hourly, 12-hourly, daily and weekly.
Download of all data sets takes ~ 16 hours. Multiple concurrent downloads significantly increase time per data set. |
Data Quality and Reliability | Each site is responsible of the quality of its data. Nevertheless, after processing the original data a Quality Control is performed with a data flagging system. See Dorigo et al. (2011) and Dorigo et al. (2021) for more information. |
Ordering and | Via ISMN data viewer providing a compressed (.zip) file at https://ismn.earth |
Access conditions and pricing | Free with previous registration and for scientific use only. Neither onward distribution nor commercial use is permitted. |
Issues | Data Formats:
|
ERA5-Land
ERA5-Land (see Chapter 2.2.3) is the main globally available, gap-free reference source for evaluating C3S SM. While ERA5 is also used in the production of the data set (during break correction; Chapter 3.3.7), it was found that no features from ERA5 are introduced to the satellite data in that step. ERA5-Land is therefore considered to be independent and is therefore used as a reference for validation.
Algorithms
Passive Microwave Algorithm
This chapter is largely based upon the “Algorithm Theoretical Baseline Document (ATBD) D2.1 Supporting Version 08.1” [D1] document produced under ESA Climate Change Initiative Soil Moisture project.
Principles of the Land Parameter Retrieval Model
Brightness temperatures can be derived from passive microwave sensors with different radiometric characteristics. The observed brightness temperatures are converted to soil moisture values with the Land Parameter Retrieval Model (LPRM; van der Schalie et al., 2017). This model is based on a microwave radiative transfer model that links soil moisture to the observed brightness temperatures. A unique aspect of LPRM is the simultaneous retrieval of vegetation optical depth (VOD) in combination with soil moisture and surface temperature.
...
Figure 2: Flowchart of the main processes of the Land Parameter Retrieval Model (LPRM). Soil moisture is solved when the observed brightness temperature equals the modelled brightness temperature as derived by the radiative transfer.
Methodology
The thermal radiation in the microwave region is emitted by all natural surfaces and is a function of both the land surface and the atmosphere. According to LPRM the observed brightness temperature (Tb) as measured by a space borne radiometer can be described as:
...
Parameter | Frequency | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
L-band (~1.4 GHz) | C-band (~6.9 GHz) | X-band (~10.8 GHz) | Ku-band (~19 GHz) | |
τa | 0 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.05 |
ω | 0.12 | 0.075 | 0.075 | 0.06 |
h1 (h for Ku-band) | 1.1 to 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.13 |
Q | 0 | 0.115 | 0.127 | 0.14 |
AV | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.3 | n/a |
BV | 2 | 2 | 2 | n/a |
C-, X- and Ku-band Model Parametrization
Soil moisture retrieval using higher frequencies are known to have issues in the more extreme climates, e.g. tropical regions, deserts and boreal forests. A single global parameterization function is used for L-band but leads to questionable behavior for some of the higher frequencies. For example, unnaturally high/low soil moisture values over certain land cover classes or non-valid model retrievals. Starting from LPRMv7 onwards, a variable parameterization is used. This counts for two parameters, dT (a local bias correction of the land surface temperature) and ⍵ (the single scattering albedo).
...
Anchor | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Figure 5: The 10/90 percentiles (P10/P90) and standard deviation (STDEV) of the LPRMv7 soil moisture retrievals from C- (6.9 GHZ, top row), X- (10.7 GHZ, middle row) and Ku-band (18.7 GHZ, bottom row). Note that Greenland is normally not run and therefore shows artefacts that are not in the final product.
Day-time Retrievals
Since the temperature distribution within the vegetation and soil is not in equilibrium during the 1:30 am observation period, and the situation varies throughout the seasons, a standard approach of optimizing LPRM left too many regions without a functional parameterization. Therefore, an alternative was found that corrects the day-time brightness temperatures to night-time values and is applied to all frequencies including Ka-band for the temperature retrieval. This was done using the following steps:
...
Figure 6: Visualized correlation of night-time (descending: Desc.) and day-time (ascending: Asc.) observations against SMAP Level 4 SM, for C- (6.9 GHZ, top row), X- (10.7 GHZ, middle row) and Ku-band (18.7 GHZ, bottom row) from AMSR2, using LPRMv7.0.
Known Limitations
The known limitations in deriving soil moisture from passive microwave observations are listed and described in detail in this section. These issues do not only apply to the current C3S CDR and ICDR soil moisture dataset releases but also to soil moisture retrieval from passive microwave observations in general.
Vegetation
Vegetation affects the microwave emission, and under a sufficiently dense canopy the emitted soil radiation will become completely masked by the overlying vegetation. The simultaneously derived vegetation optical depth can be used to detect areas with excessive vegetation, of which the boundary varies with observation frequency.
...
Figure 8: Triple collocation analysis (TCA: top) and R-value results (bottom) for several soil moisture datasets, including SMOS LPRM and AMSR-E LPRM, for changing vegetation density (NDVI). Based on Van der Schalie et al. (2018).
Frozen surfaces and snow
Under frozen surface conditions the dielectric properties of the water changes dramatically. As snow cover, ice, and frozen conditions were demonstrated to have a big impact on data quality and availability within the current Passive product, a uniform satellite driven flagging strategy was designed by Van der Vliet et al. (2020). Prior to this, all pixels where the surface temperature is observed to be at or below 274.15 K are assigned with an appropriate frozen data flag, this was determined using the method of Holmes et al. (2009). However, as this methodology is insufficiently accurate in detecting the transition to snow and frozen conditions, the new methodology was introduced by Van der Vliet et al. (2020), which uses three frequencies (Ku-, K- and Ka-band) to properly flag these conditions.
Barren Grounds and Desert Areas
Very dry conditions above deserts and other barren areas lead to subsurface scattering phenomena and complicate the process of defining a correct land surface temperature due to the increased sensing depth. To account for errors in very dry soils affecting the passive retrieval, flagging of these conditions is applied. Figure 9(b) illustrates how barren grounds can likely be flagged in a similar manner as the snow/frozen conditions (Van der Vliet et al., 2020). Based on MODIS Landcover data a first classification was made in LPRMv7 that was stepwise improved by considering the spatial patterns. The related decision tree can be found in Figure 9(a).
Anchor | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
...
Anchor | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Figure 10: Example of resulting flags for four different months in the year.
Water bodies
Water bodies within the satellite footprint can strongly affect the observed brightness temperature due to the high dielectric properties of water. Especially when the size of a water body changes over time, they can dominate the signal. LPRM uses a 5 % water body threshold based on MODIS observations and pixels with more than 5 % surface water are masked (Owe et al., 2008).
Rainfall
Rainstorms during the satellite overpass can strongly affect the brightness temperature observations, and therefore should be flagged in LPRM. Ongoing investigations are done to define a proper filtering mechanism derived from the passive microwave observations themselves. Currently, only strong events are removed due to its effect on the retrieved temperature from Ka-band, which then drops below 274.15K.
Radio Frequency interference
Natural emission in several low frequency bands is affected by artificial sources, so called Radio Frequency Interference (RFI). As a diagnostic for possible errors, an RFI index is calculated according to De Nijs et al. (2015). Most passive microwave sensors that are used for soil moisture retrieval observe in several frequencies. This allows LPRM to switch to higher frequencies in areas affected by RFI.
...
As the currently integrated SMOS mission does not have multiple frequencies to apply this method, here we base the filtering on the RFI probability information that is supplied by in the SMOS Level 3 data. SMAP, by using different channels around 1.4GHz, already has an internal mitigation of RFI that removes almost all occurrence of RFI, therefore no extra filtering is needed for use with the C3S SM.
Updated temperature input from Ka-band observations
The land surface temperature plays a unique role in solving the radiative transfer model and therefore directly influences the quality of the soil moisture retrievals. The current linear regression to link Ka-band measurements to the effective soil temperature has been adjusted and optimized by Parinussa et al. (2016) for day-time observations (Figure 11). This is done using an optimisation procedure for soil moisture retrievals through a quasi-global precipitation-based verification technique, the so-called Rvalue metric. In this optimisation, different biases were locally applied to the existing linear regression and final results have been used to create an updated global linear regression. The focus of this study was to improve the skill to capture the temporal dynamics of the soil moisture. After the updated linear regression for the land surface temperature, the Rvalue increased on average with 16.5% and the triple collocation analysis showed an average reduction in Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 15.3%, showing an improved skill in day-time retrievals from LPRM. Anchor f11 f11
...
In order to remove model dependency for the L-band soil moisture retrievals, we have collocated Ka-band observations from other satellites to SMAP and SMOS. This way, temperature input to the L-band missions is taken from actual satellite observations. This also allows to apply the new filtering methodology developed by Van der Vliet et al. (2020).
Active Microwave Algorithm
The active microwave soil moisture products utilized in the generation of the C3S soil moisture datasets are obtained from external operational sources as follows:
...
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
2 https://hsaf.meteoam.it/ (URL resource last accessed 18th December 2023) |
Merging Strategy
This chapter is largely based upon the “Algorithm Theoretical Baseline Document (ATBD) D2.1 Supporting Version 08.1” [D1] document produced under ESA Climate Change Initiative Soil Moisture project.
Principle of the merging process
The generation of the long-term soil moisture data set involves three steps (as detailed in Figure 12): (1) merging the original passive microwave soil moisture products into one product, (2) merging the original active microwave soil moisture products into one product, and (3) merging all original active and passive microwave soil moisture products into one. The input datasets considered for generating the merged soil moisture product are:
...
Figure 12: Overview of the three-step blending approach from original products to the final blended active & passive microwave soil moisture product (Adapted from Liu et al. 2012)
Overview of processing steps
The level 2 surface soil moisture products derived from the active and passive remotely sensed data undergo a number of processing steps in the merging procedure (see Figure 13 for an overview):
...
Figure 13: Overview of the processing steps in the C3S product generation: The merging of two or more data sets is done by weighted averaging and involves overlapping time periods, whereas the process of joining data sets only concatenates two or more data sets between the predefined time periods. *The [SSM/I, TMI] period is specified not only by the temporal, but also by the spatial latitudinal coverage.
Methodology
In this section, the algorithms of the scaling and merging approach are described. Notice that several algorithms, e.g. rescaling, are used in various steps of the process, but will be described only once.
Spatial Resampling
The sensors used for the different merged products have different technical specifications (Table 3, Table 4). Obvious are the differences in spatial resolution and crossing times. Both elements need to be brought into a common reference before the actual merging can take place.
...
(1) For active microwave instruments, this stands for the footprint spatial resolution.
(2) TU Wien change detection algorithm references for AMI-WS: Wagner et al. (1999)
Temporal Resampling
The temporal sampling of the merged product is 1 day. The reference time for the merged dataset is set at 0:00 UTC. For each day starting from the time frame center at 0:00 UTC observations within ±12 hours are considered.
...
Starting from v202212, day-time observations are available from the passive sensors (LPRMv7). While it is planned in future dataset versions to achieve a sub-daily temporal resolution, the temporal resampling at the current stage applies indistinctly to day- and night-time observations.
Flagging
During the temporal resampling stage, flagging is applied to the datasets where relevant information is available. The key flags set during this process are 'frozen', 'high VOD' and 'Other' and these flags are propagated through the entire processing chain to the final product.
...
A cross-flagging approach is implemented for frozen soils. This means that any frozen flags provided in any of the datasets are effectively transferred to all of the datasets. It works by reading in all of the flag data for all of the datasets, determining if the frozen flag is set in any of them and if it is, applying it to all relevant observations in all of the sensors.
Rescaling
Due to different observation frequencies, observation principles, and retrieval techniques, the contributing soil moisture datasets are available in different observation spaces. Therefore, before merging can take place at either level, the datasets need to be rescaled into a common climatology. All soil moisture observations of each product are rescaled to the climatology of a different reference, namely AMSRE, ASCAT or GLDAS for the passive, active or combined product respectively.
...
Figure 15: Example illustrating how the cumulative distribution function (CDF) matching approach was implemented to rescale original AMSR-E and ASCAT against Noah soil moisture product in this study. (a, b, c) CDF curves of AMSR-E, Noah and ASCAT soil moisture estimates for the grid cell shown in Fig. 2. (d) Linear regression lines of AMSR-E against Noah for 12 segments. (e) Same as (d), but for ASCAT and Noah. (f) CDF curves of Noah (black), rescaled AMSR-E (blue) and rescaled ASCAT (red) soil moisture products. (Figure taken from Liu et al. 2011)
Intra-annual bias correction
From version v202212 on, the source and reference samples used in the scaling procedure are first divided into 366 subsets corresponding to the data points belonging to each day of the year. The scaling parameters are then calculated and applied separately to each subset, effectively providing a seasonality and thus accounting for non-stationary biases between the different sensors (or between a sensor and the reference model). These biases are generated by the different effect that the seasonally variable environmental conditions exert on the retrieval. One of such effects is for instance the vegetation state which impacts differently the scatterometric and radiometric datasets.
As the time series are subset into smaller samples, it can occur that the calculation of scaling parameters relies on too few observations, leading to overfitting. To avoid this, the usual threshold of a minimum of 20 points is used, below which the parameters are not calculated. In this case, the global time series parameters are used, allowing to prevent data loss.
Rescaling of Active Datasets
Different sensor specifications between ERS1/2 and ERS2 (e.g. spatial resolution) need to be compensated for using scaling. The CDF curves for ERS2 are calculated based on the overlap with ERS1/2. Rescaling ERS2 against ERS1/2 and then joining them generates the AMI-WS active data set, which is subsequently scaled to the Metop-A ASCAT data (ACTIVE product) or the GLDASv2.1 data (COMBINED product) (see Figure 13).
...
Figure 16: Comparison of global and hemispheric averages of soil moisture from ASCAT before (left) and after rescaling of Metop-B ASCAT on Metop-A ASCAT.
Rescaling of Passive Datasets
The seasonal cycle associated with the SSM/I dataset is deemed to be unreliable and therefore, for all CCI products, the SSM/I seasonal cycle is replaced with that from AMSR-E. The high frequency variations (anomalies) associated with SSM/I are scaled to those from AMSR-E prior to recombining the decomposed signal. An example of the SSM/I decomposition and rescaling is shown in Figure 17.
...
Figure 17: Example illustrating how (a) the TMI was rescaled against AMSR-E, (b-e) the SSM/I anomalies were rescaled against AMSRE-E anomalies, reconstructed and merged with rescaled TMI and AMSR-E, and (f) the SMMR was rescaled and merged with the others. The grid cell is centred at 13.875°N, 5.875°W (Image courtesy Liu et al., 2012).
Rescaling in the COMBINED product
For generating the combined product, all passive and active level 2 data sets are rescaled against GLDASv2.1, with the exception of ERS1/2, ASCAT and SSMI which are discussed above.
Error characterization
Errors in the individual active and passive products are characterized by means of triple collocation analysis. These errors are used both for estimating the merging parameters and for characterizing the errors of the merged product (see section 3.3.6).
...
As expected, the error structure and the relative performance between the two sensors is reflecting the seasonal vegetation patterns (Dorigo et al., 2010). The relative weights of the sensors change accordingly throughout the year, as given by Eqn. 21-22.h3.
Error gap-filling
TCA does not provide reliable error estimates in all regions, mainly if there is no significant correlation between all members of the triplet, which often happens for example in high-latitude areas or in desert areas. TCA error estimates are therefore disregarded where the Pearson correlation between any of the data sets is deemed insignificant (i.e., p-value < 0.05).
...
Where the subscript denotes the spatial location; and the parameters ai are derived from a global polynomial regression between VOD and TCA based error estimates at locations where they are considered reliable (i.e., all data sets are significantly correlated). For TMI and WINDSAT, third order polynomials (N=3) are used and for all other sensors second order polynomials (N=2) are used, which was empirically found to provide the best regression results.
Merging
The merging procedure consists of (1) merging the original passive microwave product into the PASSIVE product, (2) merging the original active microwave products into the ACTIVE product, and (3) merging the original active and passive microwave products into the COMBINED product. The merging periods are shown in Figure 1 and listed in Table 5, Table 6, Table 7.
...
Time Periods | Active Sensors | Passive Sensors |
---|---|---|
01/11/1978 – 31/07/1987 | N/A | SMMR (a/d) |
01/09/1987 – 05/08/1991 | N/A | SSM/I (a/d) |
05/08/1991 – 31/12/1997 | AMI-WS | SSM/I (a/d) |
01/01/1998 – 18/06/2002 | AMI-WS | SSM/I (a/d). TMI (a/d |
19/07/2002 – 31/12/2006 | AMI-WS | AMSR-E (a/d), TMI (a/d) |
01/01/2007 – 30/09/2007 | Metop-A ASCAT | AMSR-E (a/d), TMI (a/d) |
01/10/2007 – 14/01/2010 | Metop-A ASCAT | AMSR-E (a/d), WindSat (a/d) , TMI (a/d) |
15/01/2010 – 31/55/2011 | Metop-A ASCAT | AMSR-E (a/d), WindSat (a/d), SMOS (a), TMI (a/d) |
31/05/2011 – 04/10/2011 | Metop-A ASCAT | AMSR-E (a/d), WindSat (a/d), SMOS (a), TMI (a/d). FY-3B (a/d) |
05/10/2011 – 30/06/2012 | Metop-A ASCAT | WindSat (a/d), SMOS (a), TMI (a/d), FY-3B (a/d) |
01/07/2012 – 28/09/2013 | Metop-A ASCAT | SMOS (a), AMSR2 (d), TMI (a/d), FY-3B (a/d) |
29/09/2013 – 28/02/2014 | Metop-A ASCAT | SMOS (a), AMSR2 (d), TMI (a/d), FY-3B (a/d), FY-3C (a/d) |
01/03/2014-30 - 09-2014 | Metop-A ASCAT | SMOS (a), AMSR2 (d), TMI (a/d), FY-3B (a/d), FY-3C (a/d), GPM (d) |
01/10/2014 – 20/07/2015 | Metop-A ASCAT | SMOS (a), AMSR2 (d), FY-3B (a/d), FY-3C (a/d), GPM (d) |
20/07/2015– 08/11/2018 | Metop-A ASCAT, Metop-B ASCAT | SMOS (a), AMSR2 (d), FY-3B (a/d), FY-3C (a/d), GPM (d) |
09/11/2018 – 31/12/2018 | Metop-A ASCAT, Metop-B ASCAT, Metop-C ASCAT | SMOS (a), AMSR2 (d), FY-3B (a/d), FY-3C (a/d), GPM (d), SMAP (d) |
01/01/2019 – 19/08/2019 | Metop-A ASCAT, Metop-B ASCAT, Metop-C ASCAT | SMOS (a), AMSR2 (d), FY-3B (a/d), FY-3C (a/d), FY-3D (a/d), GPM (d), SMAP (d) |
20/08/2019 – 04/02/2020 | Metop-A ASCAT, Metop-B ASCAT, Metop-C ASCAT | SMOS (a), AMSR2 (d), FY-3C (a/d), FY-3D (a/d), GPM (d), SMAP (d) |
04/02/2020 – 15/07/2021 | Metop-A ASCAT, Metop-B ASCAT, Metop-C ASCAT | SMOS (a), AMSR2 (d), FY-3D (a/d), GPM (d), SMAP (d) |
16/11/2021– Present | Metop-B ASCAT*, Metop-C ASCAT* | SMOS* (a), AMSR2* (d), FY-3D (a/d), GPM* (d), SMAP* (d) |
Weight estimation
The merging is performed by means of a weighted average which takes into account the error properties of the individual data sets that are being merged:
...
Similar to the generation of the PASSIVE product, relative weights at each time step are derived from the TCA- or VOD-regression based error estimates for each individual sensor. Depending on how many sensors are available within a particular period, a (1/2N) threshold for the minimum weight of a particular sensor was applied if not all sensors provide a soil moisture estimate at that day.
Break detection and correction
In C3S v202312, break detection and correction methods are introduced to the COMBINED product. These methods use reanalysis soil moisture as a reference to detect inhomogeneities in the merged satellite records.
...
Figure 21: Longest homogenous period in ESA CCI SM v04.4 (COMBINED) before adjustment (top) and after adjustment (bottom) using the QCM method. Taken from (Preimesberger et al., 2021).
Near real time (NRT) mode of the processor
The processing steps described in the previous sections work on the complete time series of the datasets. This is not feasible during NRT production of the products. Figure 22 gives an overview of the NRT processing chain. The parameters for CDF scaling and the characterised errors are precomputed during generation of the CDR and then used directly in the ICDR processing. This speeds up the processing and results in a consistent time series based on stable merging parameters. At the moment it is only possible to use night-time retrievals from passive sensors in the ICDR generation.
Anchor | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Figure 22: Overview of NRT processing chain
Output data
Table 8 lists the output fields generated by the processing system and available to data users. Detailed information about each field and the file format are provided in the Product User Guide and Specification (PUGS) [D3].
...
Field name | Description |
---|---|
dnflag | Day – night flag. Information about observation times used in the soil moisture product |
flag | Ancillary flag containing information about the reason of data unavailability |
freqbandID | Identifies the frequency band combination used for soil moisture retrieval |
mode | Specifies the orbit direction of the observation |
sensor | Information about the sensors used in the product |
sm | The soil moisture value |
sm_uncertainty | Uncertainty of the soil moisture value |
t0 | The original observation time stamp of the observation |
References
Ashcroft, P. and Wentz, F. (2000). Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document: AMSR Level-2A Algorithm, Revised 03 November. Santa Rosa, California USA: Remote Sensing Systems. https://eospso.gsfc.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atbd/atbd-amsr-level2A.pdf (URL resource last accessed 18th December 2023)
...
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
This document has been produced in the context of the Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S). The activities leading to these results have been contracted by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, operator of C3S on behalf of the European Union (Delegation Agreement signed on 11/11/2014 and Contribution Agreement signed on 22/07/2021). All information in this document is provided "as is" and no guarantee or warranty is given that the information is fit for any particular purpose. The users thereof use the information at their sole risk and liability. For the avoidance of all doubt , the European Commission and the European Centre for Medium - Range Weather Forecasts have no liability in respect of this document, which is merely representing the author's view. |
Related articles
Content by Label | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|