Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

The parameters available in the analyses are available in the forecast data.

Questions to consider

Panel
bgColorlightblue
  1. How does the HRES forecast compare to analysis and satellite images?
  2. Was it a good or bad forecast? Why?

Available plot types

Panel

For this exercise, you will use the metview icons in the row labelled 'HRES forecast' as shown above.

hres_rmse.mv             : this plots the root-mean-square-error growth curves for the operational HRES forecast compared to the ECMWF analyses.

hres_1x1.mv & hres_2x2.mv    : these work in a similar way to the same icons used in the previous task where parameters from a single lead time can be plotted either in a single frame or 4 frame per page.

hres_to_an_diff.mv     : this plots a single parameter as a difference map between the operational HRES forecast and the ECMWF analysis. Use this to understand the forecast errors.

...

As for the analyses, the macros hres_1x1.mv, hres_2x2.mv and hres_xs.mv can be used to plot and animate fields or overlays of fields from the HRES forecast.

Panel
borderColorred

Q. How does the timing and distribution of the precipitation from the forecast compare to the observations shown in the paper by PantillonWas it a good or bad forecast? Why?

Suggested plots for discussion

...

Panel
borderColorlightblue
bgColorlightlightblue
titleBGColorlightblue
titleIsobaric maps
  • Geopotential at 500hPa + MSLP :                                                                     primary circulation, Figure 1 from Pantillon et al.
  • MSLP + 10m winds :                                                              interesting for Nadine's tracking and primary circulation
  • MSLP + relative humidity at 700hPa + vorticity at 850hPa  850hPa : low level signature of Nadine and disturbance associated with the cutoff low, with mid-level humidity of the systems.
  • Geopotential + temperature at 500hPa :                                large scale patterns, mid-troposphere position of warm Nadine and the cold Atlantic cutoff
  • Geopotential + temperature at 850hPa :                                 lower level conditions, detection of fronts
  • 320K potential vorticity (PV) + MSLP, and,
  • 500hPa relative vorticity (see Fig. 14 in Pantillon) :              upper level conditions, upper level jet and the cutoff signature in PV, interaction between Nadine and the cut-off low.
  • Winds at 850hPa + vertical velocity at 700hPa (+MSLP) : focus on moist and warm air in the lower levels and associated vertical motion. Should not be a strong horizontal temperature gradient around Nadine, the winds should be stronger for Nadine than for the cutoff.
  • 10m winds + total precipitation (+MSLP) :                                               compare with Pantillon Fig.2., impact on rainfall over France.
Panel
bgColorlightlightblue
titleBGColorlightblue
titleVertical cross-sections
  • Potential temperature + potential vorticity
, &
  • :          to characterize the cold core and warm core structures of Hurricane Nadine and the cut-off low.
  • Humidity + vertical motion :                        
         to characterize
  •         another view of the cold core and warm core structures of Hurricane Nadine and the cut-off low.
  • PV + vertical velocity (+ relative humidity) :    
   
  •    a classical cross-section to see if a PV anomaly is accompanied with vertical motion or not.

...

Exercise 3 : The operational ensemble forecasts

...