Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Post-detrending cleanup: Additional outliers detected only after detrending are removed.
  • Selection of training and validation periods: For each country, separate time periods were selected for training and validation of the model. Years strongly influenced by external socio-economic anomalies (e.g., 2009 financial crisis or 2020 COVID-19 pandemic) were sometimes excluded to avoid distorting the model.

Table 1.1 summarises the training/validation periods, excluded years, and notes for each country. As mentioned, a total of 42 countries were initially considered; however, 8 countries (highlighted in red in the table) were excluded due to insufficient data coverage, irregular or incoherent distributions, or very short time series that were deemed unsuitable for model training or validation.

Table 1.1: Overview of electricity load data availability and selection by country. 

Anchor
Table1_1
Table1_1

This table provides, for each country: the ISO (3166-1 alpha-2) code, full country name, selected training and validation periods, skipped years (if any), and notes explaining the selection criteria or reasons for exclusion. The excluded countries are listed in red.

ISO Code

Country Name

Training Period

Validation Period

Skip Years

Notes

AL

Albania

-

-

-

Low data coverage, with multiple gaps and incoherent data distribution over different periods.

AT

Austria

2015 - 2019

2021 - 2024

-


BA

Bosnia & Herzegovina

2013 - 2019

2006 - 2012

2009


BE

Belgium

2013 - 2019

2006 - 2012

2009


BG

Bulgaria

2015 - 2024

2006 - 2014

-


CH

Switzerland

2015 - 2019

2020 - 2022

-


CS

Serbia & Montenegro

-

-

-

Only one year of available data (2006).

Data available for Serbia and Montenegro separately after 2007.

CY

Cyprus

2015 - 2018

2013 - 2014

-


CZ

Czech Republic

2015 - 2024

2006 - 2014

2020


DE

Germany

2018 - 2024

2014 - 2017

2020


DK

Denmark

2017 - 2024

2010 - 2016

-


EE

Estonia

2017 - 2024

2010 - 2016

-


ES

Spain

2010 - 2019

2021 - 2024

2020


FI

Finland

2017 - 2024

2010 - 2016

-


FR

France

2015 - 2024

2008 - 2014

-


GB

Great Britain

2015 - 2021

2010 - 2014

2020


GE

Georgia

-

-

-

The period of data is too short (only 3 years).

GR

Greece

2010 - 2019

2020 - 2024

-


HR

Croatia

2015 - 2024

2006 - 2014

2020


HU

Hungary

2014 - 2019

2009 - 2013

-


IE

Ireland

2017 - 2024

2010 - 2016

2020


IS

Iceland

2015 - 2019

2011 - 2013

2014


IT

Italy

2010 - 2019

2021- 2024

2020


LT

Lithuania

2017 - 2024

2011 - 2016

-


LU

Luxembourg

2022 - 2024

2019 - 2021

2020


LV

Latvia

2017 - 2024

2010 - 2016

-


MD

Moldova

-

-

-

The period of data is too short (only 5 years) and the distribution is not regular.

ME

Montenegro

2016 - 2020

2013 - 2015

-


MK

North Macedonia

2006 - 2012

2013 - 2017

2009


NI

Northern Ireland

-

-

-

The period of data is too short.

NL

Netherlands

2016 - 2024

2010 - 2014

2015


NO

Norway

2017 - 2024

2010 - 2016

-


PL

Poland

2015 - 2024

2006 - 2014

2020


PT

Portugal

2015 - 2024

2006 - 2014

2020


RO

Romania

2019 - 2024

2015 - 2018

2020


RS

Serbia

2014 - 2020

2007 - 2013

-


SE

Sweden

2017 - 2024

2010 - 2016

-


SI

Slovenia

2013 - 2019

2006 - 2012

2009


SK

Slovakia

2013 - 2019

2006 - 2012

2009


TR

Turkey

-

-

-

The period of data is too short (only 3.5 years).

UA

Ukraine

-

-

-

Data presents incoherent distributions over different periods. The most recent data seems correct, but the period is too short.

XK

Kosovo

-

-

-

The period of data is too short (only 3.5 years).

Anchor
Figure1_1
Figure1_1

Image ModifiedImage Modified


 

Figure 1.1: Examples of preliminary data cleaning for electricity load data, here shown for Germany, Great Britain, Ireland, and Slovenia. For Germany, although data were available for the entire period from 2006 to 2024, only the values from 2015 onwards were retained, as they appeared more reliable and still ensured a sufficiently long historical period for modelling. For Great Britain, the time series was shorter and characterised by a clear jump between 2014 and 2015. While anomalously low values were removed, additional adjustments were required to realign the two segments of the time series. In the case of Ireland, all available data were initially retained, as the series showed a consistent and coherent structure throughout. For Slovenia, the data showed an abrupt degradation in quality starting in 2020. In this case, only the period up to 2019 was used for model calibration and validation, discarding the more recent, less reliable values.

...

The daily electricity demand

Mathinline
Y_t

is expressed as:

Mathdisplay
Y_t = \beta_0 + \sum_{i=1}^{n} f_i(X_{i,t}) + \varepsilon_t

...

is the detrended daily electricity load at day t

Mathinline
\beta_0

is the intercept, 

Mathinline
f_i(\cdot)

...

and 

Mathinline
\varepsilon_t

is the residual error term. 

...

Mathdisplay
f_j(x_j) = \sum_{q=1}^{k_j} b_{j,q}(x_j) \, \beta_{j,q}

with

Mathinline
b_{j,q}

being the spline basis functions and

...

Anchor
Figure1_5
Figure1_5

 

Figure 1.5: Top: Time series of actual vs. predicted load in France from 2008 to 2014, comparing the GAM model (green) with the actual load (red) and a simplified model (dashed blue).
Bottom: Daily percentage error, computed as the difference between the green and red curves in the top panel, over the same period.

...

The Electricity Demand Model estimates electricity demand time series for 34 European countries, aggregated at the national level (ADM0). Data are available at daily, monthly, seasonal, and annual resolutions, following the Temporal Aggregation Procedure.

Energy Demand Model (Global Domain)

...

  1. Monthly climatology calculation over a selected reference period (e.g. 2000-2019):
    Mathdisplay
    \text{climatology}_m = \frac{\sum_{y=1}^N x_m^y}{N}
    
    where x is the HDD or CDD value for month m and year y, N is the number of years (e.g. 20).
  2. Spatial aggregation to national level (ADM0) (for more details on this please refer to Spatial Aggregation Procedure).
  3. Weighting by population to ensure that the indicator is representative of the amount of people actually living in that area.
  4. Summation of HDD and CDD to produce the final EDD index:
    Mathdisplay
    EDD = HDD_{weighted} + CDD_{weighted}

...

Table 2.1 Minima and maxima of HDD and CDD bias (C3S – IEA) for selected months (January, April, July and October). 

Indicator

Min/Max [C°]

Month



1

4

7

10

HDD Bias

Min

-63.89

-74.57

-64.62

-72.47

Max

87.07

90.65

108.27

96.47

CDD Bias

Min

49.13

-52.28

-66.04

-65.45

Max

99.35

94.74

88.85

104.47


Anchor
Table2_2
Table2_2

Table 2.2: Pearson correlation coefficients among the ENTSO-E, IEA loads and the EDD proxy for selected countries.

Country

Load ENTSO-E vs EDD

Load ENTSO-E vs IEA

Load IEA vs EDD

Australia



0.29

Canada



0.89

France

0.96

1.00

0.96

Japan



0.66

Mexico



0.14

Norway

0.33

0.99

0.95

Output Data

The model provides national-level (ADM0) time series of Heating Degree Days (HDD), Cooling Degree Days (CDD), and their sum (Energy Degree Days, EDD). Data are available at monthly, seasonal, and annual resolutions, following the Temporal Aggregation Procedure.

Note

Please note: EDD—including both HDD and CDD—is aggregated by summing rather than averaging. This approach reflects the cumulative nature of heating and cooling needs over time and ensures that seasonal and annual totals accurately represent overall energy demand.

...

For the references, please refer to the References section in the Product User Guide.

Info
iconfalse

This document has been produced in the context of the Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S).

The activities leading to these results have been contracted by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, operator of C3S on behalf of the European Union (Delegation Agreement signed on 11/11/2014 and Contribution Agreement signed on 22/07/2021). All information in this document is provided "as is" and no guarantee or warranty is given that the information is fit for any particular purpose.

 The users thereof use the information at their sole risk and liability. For the avoidance of all doubt, the European Commission and the European Centre for Medium - Range Weather Forecasts have no liability in respect of this document, which is merely representing the author's view.

...