Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Expand
titleClick here to expand the history of modifications


Version

Date

Description of modification

Chapters / Sections

 V1v1.0 3131/03/2023First versionAll 
 V1v1.1 2828/11/2023 Document Document revised following feedback from independent reviewAll
v1.220/03/2024Update in section about regression modelsSection 2.1 All


List of datasets covered by this document

...

Expand
titleClick here to expand the list of related documents (D1-D6)


Reference ID

Document

D1

Dewitte, S. and Nevens, S. (2016): The total solar irradiance climate data record. The Astrophysical Journal, 830(1), p.25.    

D2

Dewitte, S. and Clerbaux, N., 2017. Measurement of the earth radiation budget at the top of the atmosphere—a review. Remote Sensing, 9(11), p.1143.

D3

Clerbaux, N., Velazquez Blazquez, A. (RMIB), 2023, C3S Earth Radiation Budget TSI
Service: Product Quality Assurance Document. Climate Change Service,
Document ref. C3S2_D312a_Lot1.1.2.5-v1.0_202212_PQAD_ECVEarthRadiationBudget_v1.1
https://confluence.ecmwf.int/x/JFMiEg
Last accessed on 26/01/2024

D4

Clerbaux, N., Velazquez Blazquez, A. (RMIB), 2023, C3S Earth Radiation Budget TSI
Service: Product User Guide and Specification. Copernicus Climate Change Service,
Document ref. C3S2_D312a_Lot1.2.2.6-v1.0_202303_PUGS_ECVEarthRadiationBudget_v1.1
https://confluence.ecmwf.int/x/KFMiEg
Last accessed on 26/01/2024

D5

Clerbaux, N., Velazquez Blazquez, A. (RMIB), 2023, C3S Earth Radiation Budget TSI
Service: Product Quality Assessment Report. Copernicus Climate Change Service,
Document ref. C3S2_D312a_Lot1.2.2.7-v1.0_202303_PQAR_ECVEarthRadiationBudget_v1.1
https://confluence.ecmwf.int/x/HlMiEg
Last accessed on 26/01/2024

D6

Clerbaux, N., Velazquez Blazquez, A., Baudrez, E. (RMIB), 2023, C3S Earth Radiation Budget TSI
Service: System Quality Assurance Document. Copernicus Climate Change Service,
Document ref. C3S2_D312a_Lot1.3.2.5-v1.1_202303_SQAD_ECVEarthRadiationBudget_v1.3
https://confluence.ecmwf.int/x/HFMiEg
Last accessed on 26/01/2024


...

Anchor
table1
table1
Table 1: Total Solar Irradiance space instruments (acronyms definitions in footnote). The instruments used in the C3S v3.0 and v3.1 daily TSI composite are highlighted in bold.

Instrument 1

Platform(s)

Used

Operation period(s)

References

TCFM

Mariner-6 & 7

No

1969

Plamondon (1969)

ERB


Nimbus 6

No

1975

Hickey et al (1976)

Nimbus 7

Yes

1978 - 1993

Hickey et al (1980)

ACRIM 1

SMM

Yes

1980-1989

Willson et al. (1980)

Solcon 1

Spacelab 1

No

1983

Crommelynck et al (1987)

ERBE

ERBS

Yes

1984-2003

ERBE (1986)


NOAA-9

Yes

1985-1989

ACRIM 2

UARS

Yes

1991-2001

Willson (1994)

Solcon 2

Atlas 1

No

1992

Crommelynck et al (1994)

Sova 1

Eureca

No

1992-1993


Sova 2

Eureca

No

1992-1993

Romero et al. (1994)

ISP-2

Meteor-3 No 7

No

1994

Sklyarov et al. (1996)

DIARAD/VIRGO

SOHO

Yes

1996-present

Dewitte et al. (2004)

PMO06V-A/VIRGO

SOHO

Yes

1996-present

Froehlich et al. (1997)

ACRIM 3

ACRIMSAT

Yes

2000-2014

Willson et al. (2003)

TIM

SORCE

Yes

2003-2020

Kopp et al. (2005)

DIARAD/SOVIM

ISS

No

2008

Mekaoui et al. (2010)

SIM

FY 3A

No

2008-2015

Fang et al. (2014)

SOVA

Picard

Yes

2010-2014

Dewitte et al. (2013a)

PREMOS

Picard

Yes

2010-2014

Schmutz et al. (2012)

SIM

FY 3B

No

2011-present

Fang et al. (2014)

TIM

TCTE

Yes

2013-2019

Kopp et al. (2016)

SIM

FY 3C

No

2013-present

Wang et al. (2017)

TIM

TSIS-1

Yes

2018- present

Kopp, G. (2020),

CLARA

NorSat

No

2018- present

Walter et al. (2017)

DARA

PROBA-3

No

To be launched



Info
iconfalse

Anchor
note1
note1
1 TCFM: Temperature Control Flux Monitor; ERB: Earth Radiation Budget; ACRIM: Active Cavity Radiometer Irradiance Monitor; SMM: Solar Maximum Mission; SOLCON: Solar Constant; ERBE: Earth Radiation Budget Experiment; ERBS: Earth Radiation Budget Satellite; NOAA: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; UARS: Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite; ATLAS: Atmospheric Laboratory for Applications and Science; SOVA: Solar Variability; EURECA: European Retrievable Carrier; ISP: Solar Constant Gauge; DIARAD: Differential Absolute Radiometer; VIRGO: Variability of Irradiance and Gravity Oscillations; SOHO: Solar and Heliospheric Observatory; PMO: Physikalisches und Meteorologisches Observatorium; TIM: Total Irradiance Monitoring; SORCE: Solar Radiation and Climate Experiment; SOVIM: Solar Variability Irradiance Monitor; SIM: Solar Irradiance Monitor; FY: Feng Yung; PREMOS: Precision Monitor Sensor; TCTE: Total Solar Irradiance Calibration Transfer Experiment.

Anchor
section2
section2
2. Input and auxiliary data

...

It is possible to estimate the TSI as a regression against proxies coming from Sun observations such as the Sunspot number. Currently, the most used regression models are: (i) the Spectral And Total Irradiance Reconstructions (SATIRE-S, Yeo et al., 2014a and 2014b) and (ii) model is: the version 2 of the Naval Research Laboratory’s (NRL) solar variability models for Total Solar Irradiance (NRLTSI2, Coddington et al., 2015, 2016). The last one is used as This dataset is the official daily TSI record by of the NOAA CDR program. A semi-empirical approach is also possible, as in the SATIRE-S model (Yeo et al., 2014a and 2014b). Specifically, SATIRE-S derives the distribution of the magnetic features on the solar surface from full-disc solar magnetograms and continuum images, whereby the brightness of these various features is computed using a radiative transfer code from the corresponding semi-empirical solar model atmospheres. In that sense, the TSI variability in SATIRE-S is actually independent of TSI measurements. There are different uses of the SATIRE-S and NRLTSI2 models in this ATBD: 

•    They are used for the quality check of the 12 individual timeseries (Section 2.2), in particular to check the record’s temporal stability and, for some records, define observation periods to be excluded from the composite (usually at beginning or end of mission). The models can also help in detecting outliers in early instruments timeseries.

...

•    The NRLTSI2 record is explicitly not used when constructing the C3S v3.0 and v3.1 daily TSI composites, so it can be used as independent source for the validation (see methodology and results in PQAD [D3] and PQAR [D5] documents).  

2.1.1    SATIRE-S

The SATIRE-S (Spectral And Total Irradiance Reconstructions, Yeo et al, 2014a and 2014b) is a reconstruction of the TSI over the 1974-present-day period using full-disc magnetograms and continuum images of the Sun. It uses the data from the National Solar Observatory Photospheric magnetogram (NSO KP) (1974-1999), SOHO/ Michelson Doppler Imager (MDI) (1999-2009) and Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) (since 2010). These observations allow for the estimation of the fractional coverage of: quiet Sun, sunspot umbrae, sunspot penumbrae, faculae and network. A regression between these indices and the TSI is then derived and used in the reconstruction. The SATIRE-S data starts on 23rd August 1974 and provides data until 8th July 2023 (at time of writing). New data are regularly added to the timeseries. 

...

.

SATIRE-S

Full name: Spectral And Total Irradiance Reconstructions

Organization: Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung (MPI for Solar System Research)

Period covered

C3S period selected

C3S adjustment factor

23.08.1974 – 08.07.2023

01.01.1979 – 06.11.1980

Set to 1.00015

Data availability

C3S Data availability (filled)

C3S estimated noise level

100%

100% (100%)

Set to 0.5 W/m²

Anchor
figure1
figure1
Image Modified

Figure 1: SATIRE-S daily TSI values (grey) and 121-days running mean (horizontal line at 1360.75 W/m² to illustrate the change in solar minima).

DATA SOURCE: http://www2.mps.mpg.de/projects/sun-climate/data_body.html

References: Yeo et al. (2014a), Yeo et al. (2014b).

Notes:

  • The model shows marked differences in solar minima levels
  • The quality of the reconstruction is better when SDO/HMI is used, i.e. from 30.04.2010 onward (S. Dewitte, pers. comm.)

2.1.2    NRLTSI2

NRLTSI2 is the version 2 of the Naval Research Laboratory’s (NRL) solar variability models for Total Solar Irradiance (TSI). This CDR was created at the Space Science Division of the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) in collaboration with the Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics (LASP) of the University of Colorado. The NRLTSI2 CDR is published as part of the NOAA CDR Program and is documented by Coddington et al. (2015, 2016).  In this model, the daily TSI is estimated from the observation of the bright faculae and the dark sunspots on the solar disk. A linear regression between these proxies of solar activity and the TIM/SORCE TSI was established and used in the reconstruction. The model assumes a quiet Sun TSI of 1360.45 W/m² (Kopp and Lean, 2011) as estimated from the TIM/SORCE measurement at solar minimum. The reconstruction starts on 1st January 1882 and provides data until 31st December 2022 (at time of writing). New data are regularly added to the timeseries, on a quarterly basis. 


NRLTSI2

Full name: Naval Research Laboratory Total Solar Irradiance version 2

Organization: U.S. Naval Research Laboratory

Period covered

C3S period selected

C3S adjustment factor

01.01.1882 – 31.12.2022

Not used in the composite

(not applicable)

Data availability

C3S Data availability (filled)

C3S estimated noise level

100%

100% (100%)

(not applicable)

Anchor
figure2
figure2

Image Modified

Figure 2: NRLTSI2 daily values (grey) and 121-days running mean (horizontal line at 1360.45 W/m² to illustrate the stability of the solar minima). Only data onward of 1976 are shown.

DATA SOURCE:

References: Coddington et al. (2015), Coddington et al. (2016).

Notes:

  • The record is regularly updated with new data.
  • The last year data are preliminary (ICDR concept) and later incorporated in the final CDR.

2.1.3    SATIRE-S / NRLTSI2 intercomparison 

Figure 3 shows the SATIRE-S and NRLTSI2 timeseries over the 1975 – 2022 time period. The 2 models show very close agreement over solar cycle 23 (1996 – 2008) but otherwise exhibit significant differences, especially in the level of the solar minima in 1986, 1996 and 2019.

Anchor
figure3
figure3

Figure 3: Timeseries of SATIRE-S (red) and NRLTSI2 (black) TSI reconstruction models after 121-days running mean. The daily NRLTSI2 values are shown in grey. Horizontal line at 1360.75 W/m² illustrates the change in solar minima.

Anchor
section2-2
section2-2
2.2    TSI timeseries

Summaries of the 12 instruments used for the C3S daily TSI composite are shown in following tables. Each table specifies the full name, organization responsible of the data/instrument, period of time in which the TSI data is available and period of time used in the C3S composite. The percentages of data availabilities are provided for the original record, as well as after gap filling. The C3S adjustment factor and noise level are also provided (see Sections 3.1 and 3.2). An illustration of the original data is shown, the source of the original data is provided and notes specific to each instrument are listed, including identified “outliers” for some input timeseries.

Note about the graphs in Figure 4 to Figure 15 : the graphs show the timeseries of the satellite record (in green the daily and orange the 121-days running mean) after rescaling to the C3S record (in black). The NRLTSI2 data is also shown (in brown) after a rescaling on the same overlap period. The parts of the satellite record which are discarded in the C3S composite are in red (daily) and blue (121-days running mean).

2.2.1    ERB on NIMBUS7

ERB on Nimbus 7

Full name: Earth Radiation Budget on NIMBUS7

Organization: NASA / NOAA

Period covered

C3S period selected

C3S adjustment factor

16.11.1978 – 13/12/1993

01.01.1981 – 31.12.1989

0.992447

Data availability

Data availability (gap filled)

C3S estimated noise level

83.24%

89.45% (100% )

0.318 W/m²

Anchor
figure4
figure4

Image Modified

Figure 4: (rescaled) ERB timeseries (green and orange) with C3S CDR (black) and NRLTSI2 (brown) models. The parts discarded are in red and blue.

References: Hickey et al. (1980)

Notes:

  • The ERB / NIMBUS-7 instrument has no aging monitoring capability.
  • Data before 1981 and after 1990 have been discarded due to marked differences with the TSI models. The problem affecting ERB/Nimbus 7 data during the so-called "ACRIM gap" period (in between ACRIM1 and ACRIM2) has been reported by other teams e.g. Lee et al. (1995) and Chapman et al. (1996).
  • During the selected period, there are many (332) gaps of 1 day in the record (they are interpolated).
  • Outliers (Julian day): 2447881, 2445468, 2445492

2.2.2    ACRIM1 on SMM

ACRIM1 on SMM

Full name: Active Cavity Radiometry Irradiance Monitor on Solar Maximum Mission

Organization: NASA

Period covered

C3S period selected

C3S adjustment factor

16.02.1980 – 14.07.1989

07.11.1980 – 14.07.1989

0.995568

Data availability

Data availability (gap filled)

C3S estimated noise level

90.14 %

90.00% (97.96%)

0.270 W/m²

Anchor
figure5
figure5

Image Modified

Figure 5: (rescaled) ACRIM1 timeseries (green and orange) with C3S CDR (black) and NRLTSI2 (brown) models. The parts discarded are in red and blue.

DATA SOURCE 2 : http://acrim.com/RESULTS/data/acrim1/acrim1_hdr.rtf
(https://web.archive.org/web/20170209071650/http://acrim.com/RESULTS/data/acrim1/acrim1_hdr.rtf)

References : Willson et al. (1981)

Notes:

  • In general, the running mean shows a close agreement with the NRLTSI2 reconstruction, except over the very early period (1980).
  • The ACRIM1 instrument was launched on the SMM spacecraft in February 1980. From November 1980 to April 1984 the SMM attitude control was degraded, leading to the so-called "ACRIM1 spin period" (Willson, 1994).
  • In 1984, there are data gaps. These gaps are short enough to be interpolated before ingestion in the composite, except one gap of 63 consecutive days.
  • Outliers (Julian day) : 2444642, 2447772, 2444804, 2444856, 2444884, 2445473, 2445533, [2444589:2444598], 2447137, 2447138


Info
iconfalse

Anchor
note2
note2
2  Information retrievable from the web.archive.org serves as an interim solution due to ongoing issues with the ACRIM server. Future document versions will include updated links when available.

2.2.3    ERBS

ERBS

Full name: Earth Radiation Budget Satellite solar monitor

Organization: NOAA

Period covered

C3S period selected

C3S adjustment factor

17.12.1984 – 23.04.2003

02.07.1987 - 06.02.2001

0.997149

Data availability

Data availability (gap filled)

C3S estimated noise level

98.46%

97.93% ( 100%)

0.270 W/m²

Anchor
figure6
figure6

Image Modified

Figure 6: ERBS timeseries (green and orange) with C3S CDR (black) and NRLTSI2 (brown) models. The parts discarded are in red and blue.

DATA SOURCE 3 : An application, such as FileZilla, WinSCP or Wget, might be needed to open FTP sites.: ftp://ftp.ngdc.noaa.gov/STP/SOLAR_DATA/SOLAR_IRRADIANCE/ERBS2003.TXT

References: ERBE (1986)

Notes:

  • As the ERBS sampling period is 14 days, and as the ERBS measurements are relatively noisy, the "denoised" ERBS version from Mekaoui and Dewitte (2008) is used.
  • In general, the running mean shows a close agreement with the NRLTSI2 reconstructions, except over the very early period (before 02.07.1987) which has been discarded from the composite. At end of mission, from 06.02.2001 onward, there is also an apparent difference with respect to the models and the data are discarded from this date onward.
  • Outliers: none


Info
iconfalse

Anchor
note3
note3
3   An application, such as FileZilla, WinSCP or Wget, might be needed to open FTP sites.

2.2.4    ACRIM2

ACRIM2

Full name: Active Cavity Radiometry Irradiance Monitor on Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite

Organization: NASA

Period covered

C3S period selected

C3S adjustment factor

04.10.1991 – 05.05.2001

04.10.1991 – 05.05.2001

0.997821

Data availability

Data availability (gap filled)

C3S estimated noise level

93.35%

93.35% (100%)

0.215 W/m²

Anchor
figure7
figure7

Image Modified


Figure 7: (rescaled) ACRIM2 timeseries (green and orange) with C3S CDR (black) and NRLTSI2 (brown) models. The parts discarded are in red and blue.

DATA SOURCE 4 : http://acrim.com/RESULTS/data/acrim2/dayu2deg_ts_0110041651_hdr.txt
https://web.archive.org/web/20170209065021/http://acrim.com/RESULTS/data/acrim2/dayu2deg_ts_0110041651_hdr.txt

References: Willson (1994)

Notes:

  • Close agreement with NRLTSI2, except during the solar minimum on 1996, but in this case the agreement with SATIRE-S is correct.
  • Outliers (Julian day): 2451423, 2451539


Info
iconfalse

Anchor
note4
note4
4   Information retrievable from the web.archive.org serves as an interim solution due to ongoing issues with the ACRIM server. Future document versions will include updated links when available.

2.2.5    DIARAD / VIRGO on SOHO

DIARAD / VIRGO on SOHO

Full name: Differential Absolute Radiometer on Variability of Irradiance and Gravity Oscillations

Organization: RMIB

Period covered

C3S period selected

C3S adjustment factor

18.01.1996 - present

01.01.1997 – present

0.996449

Data availability

Data availability (gap filled)

C3S estimated noise level

93.95%

93.78% (98.33%)

0.121 W/m²

Anchor
figure8
figure8

Image Modified


Figure 8: (rescaled) DIARAD timeseries (green and orange) with C3S CDR (black) and NRLTSI2 (brown) models. The parts discarded are in red and blue.

DATA SOURCE 5 : http://remotesensing.oma.be/meteo/view/en/3385923-diarad.level2.web.html

References: Dewitte et al. (2004)

Notes:

  • In general, close agreement between DIARAD and the models except for the first months which have been discarded as in Dewitte and Nevens (2016) and in Froehlich (2003).
  • The aging monitoring cavity failed on 9 Oct 2017 and since then the aging is extrapolated. Although "at risk", the data is kept as it stays as long as it stays in agreement with NRLTSI2. This is justified by the few number of space instruments in the ICDR period (2021 onward).
  • Since 2010, there is an annual cycle apparent in the DIARAD/VIRGO record. This cycle has been corrected.
  • Two gaps are too long to be interpolated: one of 104 days (2008) and one of 53 days (2021).
  • Outliers (Julian day): 2452313, 2451093


Info
iconfalse

Anchor
note5
note5
5   As of 28.11.2023, the provided link to the dataset is not functional. This is the only data source in place for this dataset. The data provider has been alerted to this issue, and efforts are underway to resolve it for future accesibility.

2.2.6    PMO06 on VIRGO

PMO06 on VIRGO

Full name: Physikalich Meteorologisches Observatorium version 06

Organization: Physikalich-Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos and World Radiation Center

Period covered

C3S period selected

C3S adjustment factor

21.02.1996 – 13.05.2022

01.01.1997 – 13.05.2022

1.000181

Data availability

Data availability (gap filled)

C3S estimated noise level

97.87%

97.83% (98.88%)

0.173 W/m²

Anchor
figure9
figure9

Image Modified

Figure 9: PMO06 timeseries (green and orange) with C3S CDR (black) and NRLTSI2 (brown) models. The parts discarded are in red and blue.

DATA SOURCE 6 : ftp://ftp.pmodwrc.ch/pub/data/irradiance/virgo/TSI/VIRGO_TSI_Daily_V8_20230728.zip

References: Froehlich et al. 1997

Notes:

  • As for DIARAD, close agreement with the models except for the first months (before 01.01.2017) which have been discarded. The early increase of the VIRGO radiometers is also discussed in Froehlich (2003).
  • However, there is a significant departure from the models during the recent solar minima of 2020. As for DIARAD, the PMO06 data is kept due to the few number of instruments in the ICDR period.
  • Outliers: none.


Info
iconfalse

Anchor
note6
note6
6   An application, such as FileZilla, WinSCP or Wget, might be needed to open FTP sites.

2.2.7    ACRIM3

ACRIM3

Full name: Active Cavity Radiometry Irradiance Monitor on ACRIMSAT

Organization: NASA

Period covered

C3S period selected

C3S adjustment factor

05.04.2000-05.03.2013

05.04.2000-05.03.2013

1.000078

Data availability

Data availability (gap filled)

C3S estimated noise level

97.44%

97.44% (100%)

0.126 W/m²

Anchor
figure10
figure10

Image Modified

Figure 10: (rescaled) ACRIM3 timeseries (green and orange) with C3S CDR (black) and NRLTSI2 (brown) models. Some outliers are in red.

DATA SOURCE 7 : http://acrim.com/RESULTS/data/acrim3/daya2sddeg_ts4_Nov_2013_hdr.txt
(https://web.archive.org/web/20170209060758/http://acrim.com/RESULTS/data/acrim3/daya2sddeg_ts4_Nov_2013_hdr.txt)

References: Willson et al. (2003)

Notes:

  • In general, good agreement with the 2 models, except during the solar minimum of 2009 and also at end of mission in 2013.
  • A slow decrease of the TSI with respect to the 2 models is visible; this could indicate that aging is not fully corrected.
  • Outliers (Julian day): 2453165, 2454116, 2454117, 2454118, 2455212, 245513, 2455214, 2455213.


Info
iconfalse

Anchor
note7
note7
7   Information retrievable from the web.archive.org serves as an interim solution due to ongoing issues with the ACRIM server. Future document versions will include updated links when available.

2.2.8    TIM on SORCE

TIM on SORCE

Full name: Total Irradiance Monitor (TIM) on SOlar Radiation and Climate Experiment (SORCE)

Organization: Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics (LASP)

Period covered

C3S period selected

C3S adjustment factor

25.02.2003 – 25.02.2020

(All)

1.000256

Data availability

Data availability (gap filled)

C3S estimated noise level

94.72%

94.72% (96.62%)

0.089 W/m²

Anchor
figure11
figure11

Image Modified


Figure 11: (rescaled) TIM/SORCE timeseries (green and orange) with C3S CDR (black) and NRLTSI2 (brown) models. 

DATA SOURCE: http://lasp.colorado.edu/data/sorce/tsi_data/daily/sorce_tsi_L3_c24h_latest.txt

References : Kopp et al. (2005)

Notes:

  • With respect to SATIRE-S (black curve), there is an apparent increase of the TIM/SORCE TSI. For this reason, a correction was applied in the version 2 of the C3S CDR. However, this increase is not visible with respect to NRLTSI2 and therefore, no correction will be performed in version 3.
  • There are 2 long data gaps of 144 days and 66 days in 2013-2014. They are not interpolated using the model.
  • Outliers: none.

2.2.9    SOVA on Picard

SOVA on Picard

Full name: SOlar VAriability Experiment on Picard

Organization: RMIB

Period covered

C3S period selected

C3S adjustment factor

27.08.2010 – 03.11.2013

27.08.2010 – 03.11.2013

0.999345

Data availability

Data availability (gap filled)

C3S estimated noise level

80.43%

80.43% (100%)

0.145 W/m²

Anchor
figure12
figure12

Image Modified


Figure 12: (rescaled) SOVA/Picard timeseries (green and orange) with C3S CDR (black) and NRLTSI2 (brown) models. 

DATA SOURCE: http://idoc-picard.ias.u-psud.fr:8182/sitools/upload/sovap-data.dat

Reference : Dewitte et al. (2013a)

Notes:

  • The IDOC-PICARD website provide daily and hourly data. The daily data are less complete than the hourly, we have therefore reconstructed the daily from the hourly.
  • Outliers: none

2.2.10    PREMOS on Picard

PREMOS on Picard

Full name: Precision Monitor Sensor on Picard

Organization: Physikalich-Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos and World Radiation Center

Period covered

C3S period selected

C3S adjustment factor

27.07.2010 – 20.08.2013

27.07.2010 – 20.08.2013

1.000256

Data availability

Data availability (gap filled)

C3S estimated noise level

90.19%

90.19% ( 100%)

0.086 W/m²

Anchor
figure13
figure13

Image Modified

Figure 13: (rescaled) PREMOS timeseries (green and orange) with C3S CDR (black) and NRLTSI2 (brown) models. 

DATA SOURCE: (daily and hourly data, see note here after)
http://idoc-picard.ias.u-psud.fr:8182/sitools/upload/premos_daily_means_20130705.dat
http://idoc-picard.ias.u-psud.fr/sitools/upload/premos_hourly_means_20140429.dat

References : Schmutz et al. (2012)

Notes:

  • Short record but with excellent agreement with both the SATIRE-S and NRMTSI2 models.
  • The daily data is less complete than the hourly one. In the C3S composite we have recomputed the daily values from the hourly ones.
  • Outliers: none

2.2.11    TIM on TCTE

TIM on TCTE

Full name: Total Irradiance Monitoring on Total Solar Irradiance Calibration Transfer Experiment

Organization: Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics (LASP)

Period covered

C3S period selected

C3S adjustment factor

16.12.2013 – 15.05.2019

16.12.2013 – 15.05.2019

0.999771

Data availability

Data availability (gap filled)

C3S estimated noise level

83.46%

83.46% (93.98%)

0.092 W/m²

Anchor
figure14
figure14

Image Modified

Figure 14: (rescaled) TIM/TCTE timeseries (green and orange) with C3S CDR (black) and NRLTSI2 (brown) models. 

DATA SOURCE: http://lasp.colorado.edu/data/sorce/tsi_data/daily/sorce_tsi_L3_c24h_latest.txt

References : Kopp et al. (2016), (TCTE 2014)

Notes and references:

  • Good agreement with the 2 models.
  • During 2014 there are frequent gaps of 6-days duration that have been interpolated.
  • End of 2018-early 2019 there is a 119 days long gap that is not interpolated.
  • After the gap, and until end of mission, the decrease of the TSI is not supported by the 2 models (period 02.02.2019 – 15.05.2019).
  • Outliers: none

2.2.12    TIM on TSIS-1

TIM on TSIS-1

Full name: Total Irradiance Monitor on TSIS



Organization: Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics



Period covered

C3S period selected

adjustment factor

11.01.2018 – present

11.01.2018 – present

0.999535

Data availability

Data availability (gap filled)

C3S estimated noise level

86.30%

86.30% (100%)

0.076 W/m²

Anchor
figure15
figure15

Image Modified

Figure 15: (rescaled) TIM/TSIS-1 timeseries (green and orange) with C3S CDR (black) and NRLTSI2 (brown) models. 

DATA SOURCE: http://lasp.colorado.edu/data/tsis/tsi_data/tsis_tsi_L3_c24h_latest.txt  (version 4 is used)

References : Kopp (2020)

Notes:

  • Good agreement with the NRLTSI2 model, but apparent increase with respect to SATIRE-S
  • The TIM/TCTE is providing near real time data with a latency of about 5 days.
  • Outliers : none.


Anchor
section3
section3
3. Algorithms

Anchor
section3-1
section3-1
3.1 Radiometric correction factors

...

As some instruments (PREMOS and SOVAP) have not observed during low activity periods, it is decided to use the ‘RMS max’ column as an estimation of the instrument precision. For the ERBS timeseries, the estimated precision is not realistic (due to the use of SATIRE-S in the gap filling). It is then decided to use the ACRIM1 precision as estimate for the ERBS record, as both missions used the same radiometric cavity.  

Anchor
table3
table3
Table 3: Instrument precision estimated as root mean square (RMS) difference with SATIRE-S. The columns 'max' and 'min' correspond respectively to periods of high and low solar activity. The column ‘all’ does not involve any selection based on solar activity.


Mathinline
i
InstrumentsRMS maxRMS allRMS min

1

ERB/NIMBUS7

0.318

0.270

0.263

2

ACRIM1

0.270

0.184

0.128

3

ERBS

(0.039) 0.270

(0.037) 0.184

(0.035) 0.128

4

ACRIM2

0.215

0.187

0.139

5

DIARAD/VIRGO

0.121

0.103

0.064

6

PMO06/VIRGO

0.173

0.142

0.079

7

ACRIM3

0.126

0.111

0.064

8

TIM/SORCE

0.089

0.071

0.035

9

SOVA/PICARD

0.145

0.145

-

10

PREMOS/PICARD

0.086

0.086

-

11

TIM/TCTE

0.092

0.073

0.039

12

TIM/TSIS-1

0.076

0.057

0.031

Anchor
section3-3
section3-3
3.3    Gap filling

Many of the input records have gaps in the daily TSI values. It is the case with the ERB (Nimbus7) and ERBS (ERBE) measurements at the beginning of the composite and also of the TSIS-1 instrument at the end of the composite. In the C3S v3.0 and v3.1 daily TSI composite, a gap filling mechanism is implemented as a preprocessing of the original timeseries. A gap is filled provided it extends over less than 50 days.

...

Yeo K.L., Krivova N.A., Solanki S.K. (2014b): Solar cycle variation in solar irradiance, Space Sci. Rev., https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-014-0061-7


Info
iconfalse

This document has been produced in the context of the Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S).

The activities leading to these results have been contracted by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, operator of C3S on behalf of the European Union (Delegation Agreement signed on 11/11/2014 and Contribution Agreement signed on 22/07/2021). All information in this document is provided "as is" and no guarantee or warranty is given that the information is fit for any particular purpose.

The users thereof use the information at their sole risk and liability. For the avoidance of all doubt , the European Commission and the European Centre for Medium - Range Weather Forecasts have no liability in respect of this document, which is merely representing the author's view.

...