Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Below are plots of radiosonde/SYNOP BUFR coverage for 30 May 1-5 August 2014 - reports as decoded at ECMWF, some reports not in standard BUFR are not decoded. 

Radiosonde coverage (about 45% of stations report in BUFR, but most - apart from the dark blue stations in the plot - report reformatted TEMP, see "structure" page):

(Grey: TAC reports but no BUFR, GreenPurple: BUFR reports but no TAC, Red *: position error.  Light/dark blue indicates that there are less/more than 60% of the reports available in BUFR.  Counting reports is more problematic for radiosondes, in some cases eg South Africa there are more TAC reports because both TEMP and PILOT are produced from the same ascent.)low/high vertical resolution BUFR data).

(BUFR only reports from 76903 in Mexico, 04405 - should be 76405, 04692 - should be 76692 and 17516 - duplicate of 17607?)Radiosonde coverage (about 45% of stations report in BUFR, but most - apart from the dark blue stations in the plot - report reformatted TEMP, see "structure" page):

Synop coverage (over 60% of stations report in BUFR):

(Grey: TAC reports but no BUFR, Green: BUFR reports but no TAC, Red *: position error.  Light/dark blue indicates that there are less/more than 60% of the reports available in BUFR.)