You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

The transition from Traditional Alphanumeric Codes (TACs; TEMP, SYNOP etc) to BUFR (Binary Universal Form for the Representation of meteorological data) has been going on for at least a decade.  The WMO codes page and its links have a lot of information about the codes and the migration (not always up-to-date, and the "migration complete" label for November 2010 in the migration matrix was an aspiration rather than accomplished fact).  BUFR is a Table-Driven Code Form (TDCF; the other main WMO one being CREX).  Such a migration involves many people in many countries and once the reports have been prepared and transmitted via the GTS (Global Telecommunication System) then the task of processing them and using them in Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) can begin.  These Wiki pages are intended to help with this task by sharing information between different centres.  One important aspect is data validation, or identifying bugs and features of the BUFR reports and where necessary providing feedback to the data producers and getting errors resolved.  

The next major deadline is November 2014: it seems unlikely that there will be complete cessation of TAC transmissions then (as suggested by the WMO migration matrix) - currently (late 2013) about 45% of global radiosonde stations are reporting in BUFR.  However it is likely that transmission of some TAC data will stop and that there will be further reductions in TAC transmissions in following years.  In October 2013 the UK Met Office gave notice that on Monday 20th October 2014, the transmission of UK Land SYNOPs in the TAC format on the GTS will cease (see WMO Operational Newsletter, 'Current news' and 'Newsletter archive').  Countries are not obliged to provide such notice but for a major change like this such clarity is useful.  There are some relatively new Automatic Weather Stations that are reporting in BUFR but not in TAC.  Both ECMWF and Met Office intend to start assimilation of some BUFR data during 2014 (one or two other centres are already making limited use of the data).  Please note that the process of assessing a new data source and introducing it into operational NWP can take 6-12 months - longer if errors in the data are discovered and have to be resolved by the data producers.  Data producers should not expect to start producing BUFR data one month and switch off TAC transmission one or two months later - a longer intercomparison/monitoring period is required even if the basic data are the same (even a "simple" reformatting can introduce errors). 

For surface stations the basic content of TAC and BUFR reports is much the same (there may be higher precision for some variables in BUFR, and there is provision for more frequent reporting) - the main advantage of BUFR is the provision of extra meta-data (such as height of temperature and wind measurement and instruments used).  For land stations there is explicit inclusion of position information (which has both pros and cons, see Meta-data page).  Note that there are several different BUFR templates for "SYNOP" data (and that values can be set to missing) so particular meta-data items may not be available for all stations.  The work on marine BUFR templates and reports is at an earlier stage than that for land stations.  (Note that METAR code will be replaced by an XML based code: ICAO Meteorological Exchange Model - IWXXM.  This is outside the scope of these pages.)  For radiosondes there are more major changes to report structure - all levels (either up to 100 hPa or up to balloon burst) should be reported together (not as separate "Parts" for standard and significant levels).  For some stations there is also a move to reporting of high resolution data (eg every two seconds during the flight) which can result in 5000 or more levels compared to 200 or so for TEMP code (all parts combined).  For some stations/templates there are more meta-data and also position/time information for each level which should facilitate more accurate treatment of radiosonde drift. 

 

 

  • No labels