...
Info |
---|
Read in Recommended support checks about practises used at ECMWF. Some examples and source codes are also available there. |
Organization | Data acquisition method | Data transfer check | Data delay check | Data completeness check | Data quality check | * Data packing | Data recovery option | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Exists? | Time limit? | |||||||
BoM (ammc) |
FTP | |||||||
CMA (babj) |
---|
FTP | |||||||
CNR-ISAC (isac) |
---|
HTTP | |||||||
CNRM (lfpw) |
---|
ECPDS (push) | JPEG2000 | ||||||
ECCC (cwao) |
---|
SFTP | ||||||||
ECMWF (ecmf) | MARS retrieval | N/A | YES | YES | YES | YES | NO | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMCR (rums) |
FTP | NO | YES | YES | NO | ||||
IAP-CAS (anso) | FTP | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMA (rjtd) |
FTP | |||||||
KMA (rksl) |
---|
ECPDS (push |
) | YES | NO | YES | NO | YES | NO | |
NCEP (kwbc) |
---|
FTP | YES | YES | YES | NO | |||
UKMO (egrr) |
---|
ECPDS (push |
) | YES | YES | NO | NO |
- Data acquisition method: Acquisition method is pull (via ECPDS/FTP) from the provider's location to ECMWF's premises if not specified
- Data transfer check: Is the data transfer checked to avoid any technical issues on the way from provider's location to ECMWF's premises? Was the data delivered bit identical?
- Data delay check: Is the potential delay of data availability checked on the provider's side?
- Data completeness check: Is the data content (number of expected fields; reference field list etc) checked on the provider's side?
- Data quality check: Is there any data quality control to avoid e.g. unrealistic parameter values due to interpolation or any other kind of error either scientific or technical?
- Data packing: only if differs from the required single packing
- Data recovery option: Is it possible to recover any missing/corrupted data when needed?
- If yes, is there any time limit when the data can be rescued ? If yes, specify number of days within which the recovery action must happen.
...