...
Geopotential, temperature, potential temperature & equivalent potential temperature, winds (U/V), relative humidity (rather than sp. humidityhum.), @ 200, 500, 700, ( 850 or/both 925) hPaif need to save space, sp. humidity at 925hPa only (see fig 2 in paper, also 925hPa for winds & humidity only (not sure if this is archived?)
PV + wind (U/V) @ 330 K isentrope (see Fig.10 in paper) ( Frédéric asked for geopotential
Geopotential/winds at 1.5PVU but I don't think 2PVU (do we archive these?)
Vertical x-sections
Potential temperature, potential vorticity, winds, humidity, vertical vel. -- needs reviewing, would need all pressure levels & will be too much data? PV + winds would be priority.
Request is for: all levels for : PV, winds, vertical velocity (if poss), rel. humidity, potential temperature (last two if space permits).
Suggest: if data size is a problem, omit the reduced resolution uncertainty runs.
Good if students could use metview to plot x-section through centre of storm, finding the storm centre themselves, perhaps modifying macros themselves ?
If too much data, make the full level data only available at specific times (e.g. daily). Failing that pre-plot images.
Tephigrams
Useful for the students to compare with Emagrams.
Which location(s)?
Model or obs?
We could pre-plot these as this is not particularly interactive.
Observational data
- possibly synop data to add to plot similar to fig2?do we want soundings to plot tephigrams?
Data domain
Extract data similar to domain in figure 1 but suggest crop 50W - 20E / 30N - 65N (adjust to suitable aspect ratio)
...