Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Section
Column

Introduction

The ECMWF operational ensemble forecasts for the western Mediterranean region exhibited high uncertainty while Hurricane Nadine was slowly moving over the eastern N.Atlantic in Sept. 2012. Interaction with an Atlantic cut-off low produced a bifurcation in the ensemble and significant spread, which controls both the track of Hurricane Nadine and the synoptic conditions downstream.

The HyMEX (Hydrological cycle in Mediterranean eXperiment) field campaign was also underway and forecast uncertainty was a major issue for planning observations during the first special observations period of the campaign.

This interesting case study examines the forecasts in the context of the interaction between Nadine and the Atlantic cut-off low in the context of ensemble forecasting. It will explore the scientific rationale for using ensemble forecasts, why they are necessary and they can be interpreted, particularly in a "real world" situation of forecasting for a observational field campaign.

 

Panel
titleThis case study is based on the following paper which is recommended reading

Pantillon, F., Chaboureau, J.-P. and Richard, E. (2015), 'Vortex-vortex interaction between Hurricane Nadine and an Atlantic cutoff dropping the predictability over the Mediterranean,   http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/qj.2635/abstract

In this case study

In the exercises for this interesting case study we will:

  • study the development of Hurricane Nadine and the interaction with the Atlantic cut-off low using the ECMWF analyses.
  • study the performance of the ECMWF high resolution (HRES) deterministic forecast of the time.
  • use the operational ensemble forecast to look at the forecast spread and understand the uncertainty downstream of the interaction.
  • compare a reforecast using the current (May/2016) ECMWF operational ensemble with the 2012 ensemble forecasts.
  • use principal component analysis (PCA) with clustering techniques (see Pantillon et al) to characterize the behaviour of the ensembles.
  • see how forecast products were used during the HyMEX field campaign.
Column
width20%
Panel

Table of contents

Table of Contents
maxLevel1

...

Choose a hres macro to use, plot the total precipitation (parameter: tp), near surface wind field, relative humidity (and any other parameters of interest).

...

...

How does the timing and distribution of the precipitation from the forecast compare to the observations shown in the paper by Pantillon?

 

 

Other plot types

As for the analyses, the macros hres_1x1.mv, hres_2x2.mv and hres_xs.mv can be used to plot and animate fields or overlays of fields from the HRES forecast.

Horizontal and isobaric 
Panel
borderColorred
titleQuestions

How does the timing and distribution of the precipitation from the forecast compare to the observations shown in the paper by Pantillon?

 

Key parameters and plots

The following lists parameters and plots that are useful to produce for later group discussion:

Isobaric  maps :

MSLP + 10m winds --> interesting for Nadine's tracking and primary circulation
Geopotential height + temperature at 500hPa --> large scale patterns, position of Nadine's low and the Atlantic cutoff
Geopotential heigth + temperature at 850hPa --> lower level conditions, detection of fronts
1.5 PVU geopotential + winds or 330K potential vorticity (PV) + winds --> upper level conditions, upper level jet and the cutoff signature in PV
Vertical Crosssections in the systems :
Potential temperature + potential vorticity + normal winds --> this will allow to characterize the cold core VS warm core structures of the cutoff and Nadine's. Maybe Nadine exhibits some kind of hybrid structure at a time. I gave you and example attached.
Humidity and Vertical motion

...

Group working suggestions

...