Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Attribute NameValueExamplesComment
ConventionsCF convention string  [Other convention] :..."CF-1.6"
"CF-1.6 C3S-0.1"

Multiple conventions may be included (separated by blank spaces)

title

CF: Free text

ACDD (highly recommended)

C3S: A controlled vocabulary will be provided

"IPSL-CM5A-LR model output prepared for CMIP5 RCP4.5"A short phrase or sentence describing the dataset. In many discovery systems, the title will be displayed in the results list from a search, and therefore should be human readable and reasonable to display in a list of such names.
referencesCF: Free text
C3S: A valid doi is recommended
"doi:10.5194/gmd-8-1509-2015"

references to more information

Antonio S. Cofino Gonzalez: Published or web-based references that describe the data or methods used to produce it. This attribute is recommended in the CF conventions.

Recommend values are URIs (such as a URL or DOI) for papers or other references.
The validity of the doi values will be checked. Warnings will be raised for any other content.

sourceFree text
  • "model-generated, GloSea5-GC2"
  • "IPSL-CM5A-LR (2010) : atmos : LMDZ4 (LMDZ4_v5, 96x95x39); ocean : ORCA2 (NEMOV2_3, 2x2L31); seaIce : LIM2 (NEMOV2_3); ocnBgchem : PISCES (NEMOV2_3); land : ORCHIDEE (orchidee_1_9_4_AR5)"

Where the data is from

Antonio S. Cofino Gonzalez: The method of production of the original data. If it was model-generated, source should name the model and its version. If it is observational, source should characterize it. This attribute is defined in the CF Conventions. Examples: 'temperature from CTD #1234'; 'world model v.0.1'.

Francisco Doblas-Reyes I'm still missing information about the initialisation: what set of initial conditions was used, whether perturbations were used, etc

Eduardo Penabad: Can you (Francisco Doblas-Reyes) suggest how to do this?

institution

CF: Free text

C3S: A controlled vocabulary will be provided

"Met Office"

Francisco Doblas-Reyes I'm not convinced "Met Office" is descriptive enough. Shouldn't it be something like "C3S"?

Unknown User (brookshaw): "institution" is the origin of the data. Things like C3S will be specified elsewhere (e.g. project)

Who produced the data

Antonio S. Cofino Gonzalez: The name of the institution principally responsible for originating this data.
This attribute is recommended by the CF convention.

contact

CF: Free text

C3S: Copernicus User Support URI should be used
http://copernicus-support.ecmwf.int

 

"http://copernicus-support.ecmwf.int"

Antonio S. Cofino Gonzalez: The CMIP5/SPECS DRS define this attribute. The ACDD defines: creator_name, creator_email, creator_url, publisher_name, publisher_email, publisher_url

project

CF: Free text

C3S: "C3S Seasonal Forecast" is required, additional project info (e.g. ITT details) is optional

"C3S Seasonal Forecast"

Antonio S. Cofino Gonzalez: The name of the project(s) principally responsible for originating this data. Multiple projects can be separated by commas, as described under Attribute Content Guidelines. Examples: 'PATMOS-X', 'Extended Continental Shelf Project'.

creation_date

SPECS: YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ss<zone>

NOTE: This is ISO 8601:2004 extended format

"2011-06-24T02:53:46Z"

Antonio S. Cofino Gonzalez: The date on which this version of the data was created. (Modification of values implies a new version, hence this would be assigned the date of the most recent values modification.) Metadata changes are not considered when assigning the creation_date. The ISO 8601:2004 extended date format is recommended.  

The ACDD 1.3 names this attribute as date_create
SPECS conventions will be followed
 

commentFree text"This 21th century simulation has been forced by prescribed concentration following the rcp 4.5 scenario."

Antonio S. Cofino Gonzalez: Miscellaneous information about the data, not captured elsewhere. This attribute is defined in the CF Conventions.

forecast_type

C3S: Controlled Vocabulary

"forecast" or "hindcast"

"forecast"To identify the type of data
historyFree Text
  • "Produced using CDS Toolbox on 1/6/2016"
  • "Model raw output postprocessing with modelling environment (IMDI) at DKRZ: URL: http://svn-mad.zmaw.de/svn/mad/Model/IMDI/trunk, REV: 3436 2011-07-17T15:14:45Z CMOR rewrote data to comply with CF standards and CMIP5 requirements."

To record relevant information, such as the command history which led to this file being produced

Francisco Doblas-Reyes I understand that the versioning of the software used to create the data can be included either here or in the commit attribute. Any idea how/when to make the decision?

 

commit,

iso_lineage or lineage

Free text (ISO Lineage model 19115-2)"Produced using CDS Toolbox v1.0"

trace of the tools/scripts used

Antonio S. Cofino Gonzalez: We need a more implementtios examples on this. This could achiived in EQC WP where metadata is been part of their activities (i.e. WP4@QA4SEAS). ISO 19115-2 defines a linage model where this is been considered. TBD.

summaryACDD (highly recommended): Text, defined phrase
C3S: The content will be provided
 A short paragraph describing the dataset
keywords

ACDD (highly recommended) : text, controlled vocabulary

C3S: The content will be provided

 A comma separated list of key words and phrases.
forecast_reference_time

SPECS: YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ssZ

NOTE: This is ISO 8601:2004 extended format

"2011-06-01T00:00:00Z"

time of the analysis from which the forecast was made

UTC zone is required

...