Versions Compared

Old Version 20

changes.mady.by.user Unknown User (nagc)

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Unknown User (nagc)

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Relationship between spectral and grid resolution

IFS is a model of two resolutions: the spectral resolution determining the number of retained waves and the corresponding grid onto which these waves can be transformed. A greater spectral resolution can improve the forecast quality whilst reduced Gaussian grid resolutions can improve the efficiency of the model.

IFS model grids

IFS can make use of different latitude-longitude grids for the same spectral resolution. Each grid type offers different advantages and disadvantages.  A 'reduced' grid is one in which the number of gridpoints around each latitude circle is reduced as the poles are approached. A full grid, or 'regular' grid, has the same number of points around each latitude circle. The terms 'linear', 'quadratic' and 'cubic' refer to the number of gridpoints used to describe the shortest waves retained in spectral space. For example, linear grids use two gridpoints to describe the shortest wave, and so on.

A linear grid allows a higher spectral truncation for the same number of gridpoints as a quadratic or cubic grid. Linear and quadratic in this sense means enough gridpoints are available to compute the linear and quadratic terms in the equations respectively. Likewise a cubic grid has more gridpoints per spectral wavenumber and provides more gridpoints to describe the highest wavenumbers. However, aliassing of the quadratic (and cubic) terms in the model equations can result from using linear grids, which needs to be compensated for in the model formulation. A cubic grid removes aliassing and the need for additional filters.

For more information about IFS grids please see: OpenIFS: Gaussian grids and OpenIFS: Octahedral grid in the OpenIFS User Guide.

The following table describes the different grid types together with the filename extension used in the ifsdata filesnames (see: Download OpenIFS).

Linear reduced and Cubic Octahedral are by far the most commonly used, with cubic octahedral grids typically used for the higher resolutions.

Info

The cubic grids are only available in OpenIFS 43r3 and later. They were introduced in the IFS at cycle 41r2, operational March 2016.

Model timestep

The timestep depends on the horizontal resolution and the choice of the grid. ECMWF typically use a long a timestep as possible for efficiency reasons. However, there are times when this may result in some of the semi-Lagrangian trajectories going underground (messages can be seen in the model logfile), though generally this is not a problem.

Recommended maximum timesteps are given in the table below. Shorter timesteps can be used, though note that the model will not produce the exact same result between two forecasts with different timesteps.

Wave model grids

The ECMWF Wave Model, a component of IFS, uses a different grid to the atmospheric grid in IFS.

The wave model uses an irregular latitude-longitude grid. For such grids the distance between latitudes is set to a certain resolution in degrees, where the number of grid points per latitude is adjusted so that the actual distance between points on each latitude is roughly the same as the one between 2 consecutive latitudes.

There is an approximate match between the number of latitudes in the atmospheric grid and the wave model grid, it is still a good approximation to run the wave model on a slightly coarser grid in order to save overall cost during operational forecasts. Future developments of IFS will include a wave model grid that matches the IFS.

The table below summarises the wave model recommended grid (as used by ECMWF) for each atmospheric resolution. This is for information only, the wave initial files provided by ECMWF will already have this taken into account for the requested resolutions.


Supported spectral and horizontal grid resolutions

The table below summarizes the supported configurations of the IFS and the relationship between spectral truncation, gridpoint resolution atmosphere and wave model grids and the recommended timestep for optimum performance.


Info

Click in the column header to display the table according to that column.



Panel
borderColorgrey

On this page ...

Table of Contents
indent12px


Panel
titleIn this section...

Children Display
depth1
pageOIFS:4. OpenIFS: Grid and Resolution


Panel
titleOpenIFS User Guide ...

Children Display
depth1
pageOpenIFS 43r3 User Guide



Spectral truncationGrid
(lats pole to eq)		Grid type
Spacing at Equator
Resolution at equator
(npts at eq. / spacing)		Wave model
latitude spacing		Recommended
timestep (
min
mins)

Application

Tco1279
N1280
O1280cubic oct / _45136 / 8km / 0.070o0.125o7.5Operational forecast resolution (43r3)
Tl1279N640linear reduced / l_22560 / 16km / 0.
1406T
141o0.25o10Operational forecast resolution (40r1)

T

co1023N1024_4-

l1023

N512linear reduced / l_22048 / 20km / 0.
1758
176o0.25o10-
Tco799
N800
O800cubic oct / _43216 / 12.5km / 0.112o0.125o12-
Tl799N400linear reduced / l_21600 / 25km / 0.225o0.36o12-
Tco639
N640
O640cubic oct / _4
-
2576 / 16km / 0.140o0.25o12Operational ensemble resolution (43r3)
Tl639N320linear reduced / l_21280 / 31km / 0.281o0.
28125
36o15ERA-5 high resolution
Tco511N512_4-
Tl511N256linear reduced / l_21024 / 39km / 0.352o0.50o15-
Tco399
N400
O400cubic oct / _41616 / 25km / 0.223o0.36o15-
Tl399N200linear reduced / l_2800 / 50km / 0.45o1.0o20Operational ensemble resolution (40r1)
Tco319
N320
O320cubic oct / _4
-
1296 / 31km / 0.278o0.36o15Seasonal system 5
Tl319N160linear reduced / l_2640 / 63km / 0.563o1.
5625
0o20ERA-5 ensemble
Tco255
N256
O256cubic oct / _41040 / 39km / 0.346o
0.50o20-
Tl255N128linear reduced / l_2512 / 78km / 0.703o1.0o45ERA-Interim; Seasonal system 4
Tq213

N160

quadratic reduced / _2640 / 63km / 0.
5625
563o1.0o20-
Tco199
N200
O200cubic oct / _4816 / 49km / 0.44o1.0o20-
Tco159
N160
O160cubic oct / _4656 / 61km / 0.55o1.0o20-
Tl159N80linear reduced / l_2320 / 125km / 1.125o1.5o60ERA-40
Tq106
N80
F80quadratic reduced / _2320 / 125km / 1.125o1.5o60-
Tco95
N96
O96cubic oct / _4400 / 100km / 0.9o1.0o30-
Tl95N48linear reduced / l_2192 / 209km / 1.875o3.0o60
-Tco79N80_4T
-
T
co63N64_4-
q63
N48
F48quadratic reduced / _2192 / 209km / 1.875o3.0o60-
Tq42
N32
F32quadratic regular / _full
310km
128 / 313km / 2.813o3.0o30Development/testing only
Tq21
N16
F16quadratic regular / _full64 / 626km / 5.625o3.0o30Development/testing only








Info
  • Grid type suffix refers to the file suffix used at the end of filenames for the OpenIFS/IFS climatology files. It is also used as an argument to the 'gaussgr' command, see 4.5 OpenIFS: Grid tools.
  • The 'cubic' grid rather than 'cubic octahedral' is not listed here as it's infrequently used, the suffix for these files is '_3'.
  • T21 and T42 use the Eulerian dynamical core and a regular Gaussian grid.
  • T63 and above use the reduced Gaussian grid types.
    • Tco denotes cubic octahedral grid, Tl denotes a linear grid, Tq denotes a quadratic grid.
    Note that a linear grid allows a higher spectral truncation for the same number of gridpoints as a quadratic or cubic grid. Linear and quadratic in this sense means enough gridpoints are available to compute the linear and quadratic terms in the equations respectively. Likewise a cubic grid has more gridpoints per spectral wavenumber and provides more gridpoints to describe the highest wavenumbers
    • Other resolutions not listed here may be provided with the OpenIFS climatology files.





    HTML Comment
    hiddentrue
    this table is taken from the draft OpenIFS 40r1 paper.


    % this should match the resolutions of the climate data provided by OpenIFS.
% see  bin/gaussgr for further definitions of the grids.
    % the wave model resolutions come from the prepIFS checks (see: fc.check)

% for resolution information, look at prepIFS defaults in:
% ~rdx/prepIFS.defaults/current/40r1/setup_fc/resolution
% gives (ignoring some resolutions, only including those for which we have climate files):

    Look in /home/rd/rdx/data/ifs/rtable* to confirm no. of long pts at lats closest to eq (see Paul's message below).
    
%  T21,  _full, Eulerian dyn., 1800sec, 32x64
%  T42,  _full, Eul          , 1800sec, 64x128
%  T63,  _2   , Semi Lagr.   , 3600   , 96x192
%  T95,  l_2  , SL           , 3600   , 96x192
%  T106, _2   , SL?          , 3600   , 160x320 (LSLAG not set by 106.setup.save?)
%  T159, l_2  , SL           , 3600   , 160x320
%  T213, _2   , SL           , 1200   , 320x640
%  T255, l_2  , SL           , 2700   , 256x512
%  T319, l_2  , SL           , 1200   , 320x640
%  T399, l_2  , SL           , 1200   , 400x800
%  T511, l_2  , SL           , 900    , 512x1024
%  T639, l_2  , SL           , 900    , 640x1280
%  T799, l_2  , SL           , 720    , 800x1600
%  T1023, l_2 , SL           , 600    , 1024x2048
%  T1279, l_2 , SL           , 600    , 1280x2560
%
% _full, etc refer to the suffix on the model climate files, where _full mean regular (quadratic) Gaussian grid
% _2 means reduced regular grid, l_2 means reduced linear grid.
    Excerpt IncludeCreditsCreditsnopaneltrue
    Panel
    borderColorgrey

    On this page ...

    Table of Contents
    indent12px

    Panel
    titleIn this section...

    Children Display
    depth1
    page4. OpenIFS: Grid and Resolution


    FOr 43r3, also look in the prepIFS default directory.
    However, there is a discrepancy between the namfpd@NLON values in those files and the
    formula on the octahedral grid page: Nlat = 4 x i + 16  where i=1,.. N.
    For an O1280 grid (Tco1279) -> Nlat = 4 x 1280 + 16 = 5136. This doesn't match namfpd@NLON = 5120.
    I've used the 4i+16 formula in working out the NLONeq values above for Tco grids.

    Checking with Paul Dando (the oracle of all things grids...)

    The formula for the number of longitude lines at latitude=i = 4*i + 16 (starting with i=1 nearest the pole) is definitely correct.  So the latitude nearest the equator for the O1280 grid has 4*1280 + 16 = 5136 longitude points.

    In fact, you can check this in the NAMGRI namelist (read from, e.g. /home/rd/rdx/data/ifs/rtable_41279).  Here you will see that line nearest the pole has 20 points and those nearest the equator have 5136 points

    My conclusion is, therefore, that namfpd has the wrong number for the octahedral grids.

    Of course, I don't know what namfpd@NLON refers to in fullpos.  It could be that this is the number of longituide points on the full Gaussian grid (which is always 4*N) ?

    Or perhaps it's just not been updated and still refers to the old-style reduced grids which did have 5120 points at the latitudes nearest the equator.

    I hope that helps.







    Excerpt Include
    Credits
    Credits
    nopaneltrue

    Panel
    titleOpenIFS User Guide ...
    Children Displaydepth1pageOpenIFS User Guide