Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Interpolation of winds at 1000 hPa affected by::

  • use by MIR of using an  intermediate full (regular) Gaussian grid at a resolution corresponding to the target lat-lon resolution for the spectral to grid transformation followed by grid-to-grid interpolation
  • use by MIR of using a more accurate truncation of the spectral series corresponding to correspond the target grid resolution to avoid ripples from aliasing effects

...

  • For transformations to high resolution target grids (0.1x0.1 and 0.125x0.125) for which no spectral truncation occurs
    • differences are at most +/-3.5m/s
    • differences are smaller than +/-0.5m/s for more than 99% of grid points
    These differences are due to the use of MIR making the spectral transformation to an intermediate Gaussian grid followed by grid-to-grid interpolation to the regular lat-lon grid whereas EMOSLIB transforms directly to the lat-lon target grid.
  • For transformations to lower resolution target grids:
    • the maximum and minimum differences are significantly larger.
    • differences are smaller than 1 m/s for more than 80% of grid points
    • larger differences are due to sub-optimal default truncation of the spectral series used by EMOSLIB:
      • EMOSLIB uses truncation=T799 for a 0.25x0.25 where target grid compared to the theoretical  ideal used by MIR is of truncation=T719
      • EMOSLIB uses truncation=T319 for a 0.5x0.5 where target grid compared to the theoretical  ideal used by MIR is of truncation=T359
      • EMOSLIB uses truncation=T213 for a 1.0x1.0 where target grid compared to the theoretical  ideal used by MIR is of truncation=T179
      Consequently, fields produced by EMOSLIB are more affected by 'aliasing' than those produced by MIR.
  • Generally, the The use of the intermediate grid with MIR generally produces smoother fields.

...