Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Code Block
titleExample using T159
% mkdir -p runs/lothar/t159
% cd runs
% ftp ftp.ecmwf.int
ftp> cd case_studies/lothar_storm
ftp> binary
ftp> get 1999122412_T159_fqar.tgz
ftp> quit
% tar zxf 1999122412_T159_fqar.tgz
% ls
1999122412_T159.tgz  ICMCLfqarINIT  ICMGGfqarINIT  ICMGGfqarINIUA  ICMSHfqarINIT  fqar.ecmwf
% ls ecmwf
NODE.001_01  fqar.namelistfc

...

namelistfc

The 'ecmwf' directory contains the files as used at ECMWF to run this experiment:

  • namelistfc : copy this file to 'fort.4' to run the experiment (modify as required)
  • NODE.001_01 : this is the model output file as run at ECMWF. If your run fails, it may be useful to compare with this file.

Suggested experiments

As ERA-Interim is an improved analysis, forecasts from these starting initial conditions will not reproduce the actual forecast of the storm. For that, the model should be run with operational data.

  • What's the impact of the different 'lead times' on the forecast of the storm (i.e. starting from different dates)?
  • What's the difference and why between forecasts started with the operational analysis of the time and the ERA-Interim analysis?
  • What's the impact of resolution on the forecast of the storm?

...