You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 31 Next »


 

Lothar storm

Introduction

The Lothar storm that swept across Europe during 24-27 December 1999 is provided as a sample case study to use with OpenIFS. This storm was one of several storms to hit Europe in December 1999 and Lothar severely affected northern France, Switzerland and Germany (for more details see: Ulbrich et al., 2001, Weather, 56, 70-80).

These storms were characterized by record-breaking windspeed observations and rapid development across Europe. There was also a band of extremely high baroclinity near the cyclone track over the N. Atlantic and partly into Europe associated with Lothar.

The ECMWF forecasting system of the time did not accurately capture the storm's intensity though the strong jet stream was predicted some 9 days earlier. The storm initiated from a small disturbance in the Atlantic. More recently, Wedi et al, 2012, ECMWF Newsletter, have shown that very high resolution (T7999; ~2.5km) is necessary to model accurately the high wind speeds observed, particularly over the mountainous regions of Europe.

A number of initial conditions are provided along with suggested exercises.

 

 

On this page...

Initial conditions

Case study initial conditions for the Lothar storm are provided on the OpenIFS ftp site. The Lothar depression developed initially on 24th December off the North American east coast at 35N.

The initial conditions are available at a range of different resolutions and start dates for a 10 day forecast. The experiment ids are created at ECMWF and used for identifying the model forecasts on the ECMWF archive system (for those with access).

Note that ERA-Interim has a resolution of T255 and the operational resolution at that time was T319. Initial data has been spectrally interpolated to the model resolutions.

Single start dates
ResolutionExpt idStart dateAnalysisFilenameFile size
T159L60fqar1999/12/24/12zERA-InterimT159_1999122412_fqar.tgz22Mb
T255L60fqak1999/12/24/12zERA-InterimT255_1999122412_fqak.tgz54Mb
T511L60fqaj1999/12/24/12zERA-InterimT511_1999122412_fqaj.tgz205Mb
T1023L60fs2y1999/12/24/12zERA-InterimT1023_1999122412_fs2y.tgz780Mb
T1279L60fqaf1999/12/24/12zERA-InterimT1279_1999122412_fqaf.tgz1.2Gb

To unpack files with .tgz, either use:

tar zxf T159_1999122412_fqar.tgz

or if your tar command does not support compression:

mv T159_1999122412_fqar.tgz T159_1999122412_fqar.tar.gz
gunzip T159_1999122412_fqar.tar.gz
tar xf T159_1999122412_fqar.tar

Multiple start dates
ResolutionExp idStart datesAnalysisFilenameFile size
T255g8oz1999/12, 14th-25th, 12zERA-InterimT255_199912_14-25_g8oz.tar.bz2660Mb
T511g8su1999/12, 14th-25th, 12zERA-InterimT511_199912_14-25_g8su.tar.bz2 2.3Gb
T1279g8t31999/12, 14th-25th, 12zERA-InterimT1279_199912_14-19_g8t3.tar.bz2
T1279_199912_20-25_g8t3.tar.bz2
6Gb

These files use the 'bzip2' command rather than 'gzip', to achieve a better compression.

Uncompressing may take a long time depending on your system.

To uncompress:

bzip2 -d T255_199912_14-25_g8oz.tar.bz2
tar xf T255_199912_14-25_g8oz.tar

 

Download instructions

Example using T159
% mkdir -p runs/lothar/t159
% cd runs
% ftp ftp.ecmwf.int
ftp> cd case_studies/lothar_storm
ftp> binary
ftp> get 1999122412_T159_fqar.tgz
ftp> quit
% tar zxf 1999122412_T159_fqar.tgz
% ls
1999122412_T159.tgz  ICMCLfqarINIT  ICMGGfqarINIT  ICMGGfqarINIUA  ICMSHfqarINIT  ecmwf
% ls ecmwf
NODE.001_01  namelistfc

The 'ecmwf' directory contains the files as used at ECMWF to run this experiment:

  • namelistfc : copy this file to 'fort.4' to run the experiment (modify as required)
  • NODE.001_01 : this is the model output file as run at ECMWF. If your run fails, it may be useful to compare with this file.

Suggested experiments

As ERA-Interim is an improved analysis, forecasts from these starting initial conditions will not reproduce the actual forecast of the storm. For that, the model should be run with operational data.

  • What's the impact of the different 'lead times' on the forecast of the storm (i.e. starting from different dates)?
  • What's the difference and why between forecasts started with the operational analysis of the time and the ERA-Interim analysis?

Sensitivity experiments

The IFS is highly tuned to give the best forecast over a range of initial conditions. However, it is instructive to try some sensitivity experiments to understand the role of various physical and dynamical processes.

  • What's the impact of resolution on the forecast of the storm?

  • Reduce the timestep of the model - does this improve or worsen the forecast?

  • Reduce the gravity wave drag - how does this affect the forecast in the upper and lower levels?

 

 Edit the source code to half the gravity wave drag coefficient

File: ifs/phys_ec/sugwd.F90, change:

Line 108: !  Revised gwd parameter values
Line 109: GKDRAG =0.15_JPRB

to:

Line 108: !  Revised gwd parameter values
Line 109: GKDRAG = 0.075_JPRB   !  half GWD coefficient: 0.15_JPRB

 

Further reading

This article in a recent ECMWF Newsletter has a description of student projects at the University of Stockholm using the Lothar storm case study.

A. Hannachi, J. Kjellsson, M. Tjernström, G. Carver, 2012, Teaching with the OpenIFS at Stockholm University, ECMWF Newsletter No. 134, Winter 2012/13.

Wikipedia article:

Cyclone Lothar and Martin, Wikipedia article, retrieved 17/12/14.

 


 

 

  • No labels