Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

 The plot below shows the evolution of central pressure in Best Track (dots) and LWDA analysis (solid line). The result shows that the analysis on 15 September 00UTC filled up the cyclone too much after the passage of Luzon.

The plot below shows the observation statistics for surface pressure observations within 1 degree box following the cyclone. Along the tracks, the cyclone did not pass many observations. On the 15 September 00UTC the first guess departures were large, indicating a too strong cyclone in the short forecast but the analysis fit the observations better.

Image Added

The plots below show the observation minus first guess (left) and observation minus analysis (right) for all observations (top) and used (bottom) for surface pressure. The plot is for 15 September 00UTC.


Image Added




3.2 HRES

The plot below shows the central pressure in HRES (coloured lines) and BestTrack (black). The plot starts at 14 September 00UTC. 

Image Added

3.3 ENS

The plots below show the tracks (ensemble -grey, best track - black), position and intensity on 14 September 12UTC (ensemble - squares, best track - hourglass) in forecasts from 13 September (first plot) to 4 September (last plot). Early forecasts (up to 8 September) predicted a more northerly path . Later forecasts were more correct but still a northerly shift at the longitude of the Philippines. The forecast from 12 September had a plume centred on the landfall point, but instead got a southerly shift of the China landfall.

Image ModifiedImage ModifiedImage ModifiedImage ModifiedImage ModifiedImage ModifiedImage ModifiedImage ModifiedImage ModifiedImage ModifiedImage Modified

The series of plot shows the same as above but with the symbols representing the position and intensity on 16 September 00UTC, just before the landfall on China.

...