Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: FAQs

...

Section
Column

What is the octahedral grid ?

The octahedral grid has been inspired by the Collignon Projection of the sphere onto an octahedron. It is a form of reduced Gaussian grid with the same number of latitude lines located at the same latitude values as those of a standard Gaussian grid but with the number of longitude points at each latitude circle computed according to the formula:

Mathdisplay
\begin{eqnarray*}
\mbox{N}_{lat}(lat_N) & = & 20 \\
\mbox{N}_{lat}(lat_i) & = & \mbox{N}_{lat}(lat_{i+1}) + 4,  \mbox{ for } i=\mbox{N} - 1,\ldots,1
\end{eqnarray*}

In other words, there are 20 longitude points at the latitude circle closest to the poles with the number of points increasing continuously by 4 at each latitude towards the equator. This is in contrast to the standard reduced Gaussian grid where there are 'jumps' between blocks of latitudes with a constant number of longitude points (a restriction imposed by the Fast Fourier Transform routines being used prior to IFS cycle 41r2).

As a consequence, the zonal resolution of the octahedral grid varies more with latitude than for the standard reduced Gaussian grid. This can be seen the figures to the right.

Note in particular that the octahedral grid has 4N + 16 longitude points at the latitude circle closest to the equator whereas the standard reduced Gaussian grid has 4N longitude points at the latitude circle closest to the equator.

There are also fewer total grid points in the octahedral grid compared to the standard reduced Gaussian grid.For example, the N1280 octahedral grid has about 20% fewer grid points than the equivalent N1280 linear grid. Generally, there are 4xNx(N+8) grid points in the octahedral grid or resolution N.

The octahedral grid has been shown to improve the calculation of local derivatives in grid point space.

Column

Figure 1

Comparison of the resolution for the reduced Gaussian grids with latitude.  The full red and yellow curves show the resolution for the standard reduced Gaussian grids at N1024 and N1280.  Note that the resolution remains more or less constant at 10km and 8km, respectively, as the latitude varies.  The corresponding curves for the N1024 and N1280 octahedral grids are shown by the dashed and full blue lines, respectively.  Note that the resolution for the N1280 octahedral grid varies from about 8 km at the equator, increasing to about 10 km at 70oN and 70oS before decreasing again towards the poles. The resolution of the N640 standard reduced Gaussian grid used at IFS cycle 41r1 is at about 16 km. Also shown are the regular Gaussian grids at N1024 (black dashed line) and N1280 (black full line).

Figure 2

Comparison of the zonal variation in resolution for the N1280 standard reduced Gaussian grid (left) with the corresponding octahedral grid (right) on the surface of the sphere

 

 

Section

Frequently asked questions

Will the change to the cubic octahedral grid affect me if I use regular lat-lon data ?

No, users of regular lat-lon data will be unaffected by the change of model grid.  They will, however, benefit from the increase of the model horizontal resolution.

Will ECMWF make data available on the standard regular and reduced Gaussian grids ?

Yes, users will still be able to request data, both in dissemination and MARS, of the standard regular and reduced Gaussian grids. 

I use point data (e.g., for meteograms, vertical profiles, etc) - what do I need to do ?

Check LSM.

Is the new land-sea mask and orography for the cubic octahedral grid available ?

Yes, the new land-sea masks and orography fields for HRES at TCO1279 (N1280), ENS Leg A at TCO639 (N640) and ENS Leg B TCO319 (N320) can be downloaded from ...

Do I need to upgrade the version of GRIB API I use in order to decode data on the cubic octahedral grid ?

Version 1.12.3 of grib_api can decoded fields on the cubic octahedral grid correctly.  At grib_api 1.14.0, a new computed key is introduced which allows users to query the grid type.

Can GRIBEX decode data on the cubic octahedral grid ?

To be checked. But you should not use GRIBEX.

I make computations involving flux parameters or accumulated fields (for example, to de-accumulate precipitation) and am advised to work on the model grid:  which grid should I use ?

For performing computations with accumulated fields, users are advised to request data on the cubic octahedral grid.

Is there any change to the vertical resolution at IFS cycle 42r1 ?

No, only the horizontal resolution is increased.  The vertical resolution remains at L137 for HRES and L91 for ENS.

What will happen if I retrieve IFS cycle 42r1 data from MARS using grid=av ?

Users retrieving data from MARS with the keyword, grid=av ("archived value") will retrieve data on the model grid.  For data from IFS cycle 42r1 this will be the cubic octahedral grid.

What will happen if I retrieve IFS cycle 42r1 data from MARS using grid=1280 ?

This behaviour is unchanged. By default, users retrieving data from MARS with the keyword, grid=1280 will retrieve data on the regular N=1280 Gaussian grid. 

Will ERA-Interim fields also use the cubic octahedral grid ?

No, the horizontal resolution upgrade applies only to ECMWF HRES and ENS operational forecasts, including the monthly extension.

Will the ECMWF System 4 Seasonal Forecasts (SEAS) also use the cubic octahedral grid ?

No, the horizontal resolution upgrade applies only to ECMWF HRES and ENS operational forecasts, including the monthly extension.